By Plenary Sessions: Helir-Valdor Seeder

Data is unavailable. (The speaker is only engaged in intense criticism of the ministers in this context.)

No data available.

The speaker referred to a similar question posed by another politician (Aivar Kokk), suggesting a certain awareness of colleagues' issues. The material presented contains no evidence of direct cooperation or readiness to compromise with the government, but rather sharp opposition.

The cooperative style is pragmatic yet cautious; reference is made to a previous failed coalition experience where the Social Democrats drew a "red line" on crucial security matters. Although they remain open to alternative solutions concerning the restriction of voting rights, they insist on concrete political and legal steps, rather than vague proposals ("shady talk").

The speaker is acting on behalf of the Isamaa faction, demonstrating internal cooperation within the faction. Externally, the presiding officer is urged to show flexibility and adopt the proposal, which indicates a desire to find a solution in collaboration with the board.

The speaker represents the views of the Isamaa faction and is uncompromising regarding the government's structural reforms, urging coalition politicians to think like statesmen and reconsider the decision. He/She supportively references the questions posed by other colleagues, demonstrating cooperation within the opposition. There is no apparent willingness to find compromises with the government concerning this specific bill.

The speaker demonstrated a willingness to cooperate by expressing agreement with colleague Tanel Kiik’s position regarding the necessity of gaining clarity. This indicates a readiness to join other colleagues in resolving procedural matters.