By Plenary Sessions: Urmas Reinsalu

The main opponent is the government (the Reform Party) and the Prime Minister, who are accused of systematically accelerating inflation, creating tax chaos, and lying to the people about cutting governing costs. The criticism is intense and focuses on political incompetence, unconstitutional budget management, and the postponement of substantive decisions until the post-election period. Compromise is ruled out, except regarding the necessity of increasing defense spending.

The resistance is aimed at the governing coalition (SDE, E200, Reform Party) and the Minister of Agriculture, who are criticized for indecisiveness and a lax attitude toward solving crises. The criticism is political and procedural, accusing the government of planning a secret climate tax and ignoring entrepreneurs. The speaker publicly demands to know who this "crocodile" is that is obstructing the minister's decisions.

The main opponent is the government and the prime minister, who are sharply criticized for fiscal irresponsibility. The criticism is both policy-based (unfunded budget, postponement of defense expenditures) and procedural, accusing the government of a contradiction between their words and deeds. There is no willingness to compromise, with the government being accused of choosing the "path of living on debt."

The main criticism is aimed at the governing coalition (specifically Mrs. Laur and Jürgen Ligi) and ministers who are accused of lying, deliberately forcing through an unconstitutional law, and evading the public eye. The criticism is both political (the construction of a surveillance state) and procedural (lying about the necessity of EU law). A compromise (a cosmetic change) is categorically rejected, with demands for complete repeal.

The main opponent is the Reform Party government, which is sharply criticized for the curtailment of freedoms, constitutional violations, and excessive bureaucracy. The criticism is intense and substantive, demanding the withdrawal of the draft legislation and promising to reverse the restrictive initiatives. The criticism targets both political accountability and the legal deficiencies of the bills.

The main criticism is directed at the Minister of Social Affairs (Health) and the government as a whole, accusing them of management incompetence, ignorance regarding cash flow, and inadequate family policy. The representative of the commission is directly criticized for presenting false information about the protests by entrepreneurs, thereby pointing to a procedural breach in informing Parliament. The government's policy is referred to as a "left-wing critique" concerning private medicine.

Direct opposition to the government is not expressed; rather, criticism is aimed at the executive branch's slow pace and lack of clarity regarding critical security matters. Specifically, there is criticism concerning the delay in procuring the acoustic surveillance system due to economic or financial reasons, despite the fact that bids were submitted last year. The criticism is procedural, focusing on the speed of decision-making and the need to eliminate confusion surrounding the division of competencies.

The primary opposition is directed at the Minister of Defense, who is sharply criticized for weak leadership, delaying decisions, and dishonesty toward the State Audit Office. The criticism is both substantive and procedural, focusing on the failure to provide information regarding contracts valued at half a billion, and the ignoring of military advice. The speaker believes the situation is too serious to give a member of the government "remedial lessons," and advises him to consider resigning.

The primary targets are the Reform Party-led government coalition and Prime Ministers Kaja Kallas and Kristen Michal, both of whom face accusations of lying and incompetence. The criticism is intense and multi-faceted, encompassing political decisions (tax hikes), ethical controversies (Kallas’s family business, pressure on the Prosecutor’s Office), and violations of parliamentary rules of procedure. The coalition stands accused of imposing a "dictate" and systematically curtailing the rights of the opposition.