By Plenary Sessions: Urmas Reinsalu

The speaker actively participates in parliamentary debates, initiating a discussion on the nationally important issue of inflation. He/She refers to previous warnings and questions addressed to the government (e.g., questions submitted the previous day) and is involved in drafting an alternative budget. This pattern of activity demonstrates systematic opposition work during parliamentary plenary sessions.

The pattern of activity is linked to active participation in the plenary session, where interpellations are submitted to the minister, demanding real-time decision-making. The speaker closely monitors current events and news (layoffs, approval of the budget strategy) and uses them to support their arguments.

They actively participate in the Riigikogu Q&A session, promptly asking the Prime Minister detailed questions regarding the newly submitted state budget strategy. This mode of operation is aimed at the swift and public scrutiny of government policy.

The speaker is active during the parliament's plenary session, raising both substantive questions (addressed to Ando and Ms. Lauri) and procedural inquiries (concerning, for example, the right to withdraw the bill). Their activity is intensely focused on challenging and criticizing the ongoing legislative procedure.

Speeches were delivered during the plenary session, which included questions directed to the Chancellor of Justice and participation in the debate. Reference was also made to the parliament's upcoming discussions ("to discuss tomorrow") and to previous events, such as the President's refusal to proclaim [a law] and the joint sitting of the committees.

The speaker is very active during the session, posing repetitive and clarifying questions to both the minister and the commission representative. He/She references previous intra-factional discussions with the minister and personal conversations with business representatives (Tallink). His/Her pattern of activity involves systematically gathering information and contrasting it with the official presentations.

The speaker is active during the Q&A session, reacting quickly to both recent international events (the Poland incident this morning) and domestic security issues. He/She closely monitors statements made by government members, referencing the defense minister's remarks from the parliamentary rostrum yesterday. This pattern of activity demonstrates a rapid response to security developments and continuous oversight of government actions.

The speaker is an active Member of Parliament, taking part in several debates during the plenary session and posing detailed questions to both the Minister of Defence and the Minister of Finance. They reference previous, repeated calls made to the government and are well-versed in official departmental documentation, including the 17-page memorandum issued by the National Audit Office.

The speaker is very active in the Riigikogu plenary session, regularly submitting interpellations (to Prime Ministers Kallas and Michal) and initiating draft resolutions of the Riigikogu (such as for forming investigative committees or closing the border). A recurring pattern of activity is making proposals to change the agenda and raising procedural questions against the Riigikogu Board. The member also submits the work reports of the Select Committee on State Budget Control.