By Plenary Sessions: Urmas Reinsalu

The speaker is strongly opposed to tax increases, listing 26 new taxes and levies planned for 2026, the consolidated impact of which amounts to nearly three-quarters of a billion euros. He advocates for tax stability and a reduction in government expenditures (300 million euros). He objects to ideological regulation (sustainability reports), emphasizing that the social mission of companies is to earn profit based on the rules of the market economy, not to serve ideological notions.

The economic views expressed are strongly opposed to increasing the tax burden and regulatory fees, emphasizing the negative impact this will have on entrepreneurship and people’s livelihoods. Criticism is leveled against the introduction of VAT hikes, a new car tax, and other new fees (related to waste reform and energy costs), which collectively add a burden exceeding one billion euros. Proponents advocate for fiscal discipline, accusing the government of increasing governance costs contrary to its stated objectives.

The economic views are strongly opposed to tax hikes, particularly regarding the indirect tax burden and income taxes, which are being raised to the highest level in the region. The speaker argues that the opponents' policy will lead to higher prices and a permanently high tax burden, contradicting the promise of temporary taxes.

The economic views are strongly fiscally conservative and anti-inflationary, calling for the abandonment of tax hikes (VAT, income tax) and a drastic reduction in government spending. It is emphasized that tax increases and rising expenditures directly erode the purchasing power and standard of living of the populace (both wage earners and pensioners).

Economic views are strongly opposed to tax increases, emphasizing that government measures increase the real tax burden, especially through indirect and direct taxes. They demand the abolition of the car tax, arguing that it has stifled the economy (car sales have plummeted by 50%) and failed to meet climate targets. They also wish to know the total amount of additional tax revenue expected within the framework of the state budget strategy.

Economic views are strongly free-market oriented: they demand the abandonment of subsidy policies and respect for market choices. They oppose increasing regulatory burdens and taxes (the 45% electricity excise tax, the VAT hike), arguing that these harm the competitiveness of the economy. They criticize the practice of socializing the connection fees for new capacities, shifting the burden onto consumers.

The speaker strongly supports fiscal discipline and transparency, criticizing the government's inability to reduce costs and the growth of administrative expenses. Opposition is also voiced against indirect tax increases, which harm domestic consumption, small businesses, and the financial stability of the elderly. Furthermore, the management of state-owned companies (specifically, the Enefit Green buyback scheme) is criticized.