By Plenary Sessions: Urmas Reinsalu

The speaker was extremely active during the plenary session on April 23rd, repeatedly posing questions and delivering lengthy critical speeches concerning the draft energy law. They referenced previous events, such as the sabotage of Estlink 2 and the drop in Eesti Energia's rating in January, demonstrating a consistent focus on energy crisis issues.

The records indicate active participation in the Riigikogu Question Time in April 2025, during which the individual addressed three consecutive and substantively related questions to the Prime Minister. No other patterns of activity or frequency of appearances can be determined from these specific statements.

The speaker actively participates in the plenary session, asking questions and introducing Isamaa's draft legislation across various sectors. Earlier initiatives are referenced (the energy bill was submitted a year ago and again at the beginning of February), demonstrating persistent activity while in opposition. There is also mention of the bill being held up for months in the parliament's Economic Affairs Committee.

This pattern of activity involves thorough preparation for parliamentary questions, submitting preliminary background information to the government through board advisors. The focus is on substantive dialogue during Question Time, stressing procedural correctness and the expectation of meaningful answers. They appear multiple times during the same session to receive answers to their clarified questions.

The speaker is active during the plenary session, asking detailed questions of the minister and requesting additional time to elaborate on their views. They are participating in a substantive debate concerning the implementation of the nation's long-term development strategy. Information regarding their broader pattern of activity is unavailable.

The speaker is actively working to hold the government accountable, having submitted an interpellation on February 27th and demanding responses nearly two months later, on April 14th. This pattern demonstrates persistent and consistent action in monitoring and criticizing a specific issue (offshore wind farms) within the Riigikogu chamber. Reference is also made to the dismissal of an official from the Ministry of Climate, which clearly shows active tracking of these events.

According to the data, the speaker is addressing the Riigikogu plenary session, reacting to current events and recent analyses (e.g., the Bank of Estonia analysis, articles in Maaleht).

Lack of data

The data is limited to the speaker's appearance at the Riigikogu plenary session, where they requested additional time, indicating a thorough and time-consuming intervention in the parliamentary debate.