By Months: Valdo Randpere
Total Months: 9
Fully Profiled: 9
11.2024
4 Speeches
The collaborative style is rather confrontational and didactic, focusing on correcting and refuting the opponents' viewpoints. Although respect is mentioned for the procedural role of one colleague (Kalle), direct cooperation or seeking compromise with opposing parties is not mentioned.
10.2024
1 Speeches
The speaker highlighted the successful and unanimous cooperation within the committee, which resulted in the decision to reject the draft bill. He/She referred to the views of other committee members (including Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart and Andre Hanimägi) which supported his/her position. This demonstrates a readiness for procedural cooperation and achieving consensus at the committee level.
09.2024
1 Speeches
The collaborative style is initially demanding and confrontational, insisting that the counterparty admit their mistake and revoke the decision. Nevertheless, the speaker proposes, as a solution, taking the matter into standard procedure. This suggests a readiness to accept the result following a proper vote, whichever way it may go.
06.2024
1 Speeches
Insufficient data
05.2024
4 Speeches
He acts in the commission as a mediator and clarifier, highlighting the substantive core of the opposing side’s (Kalle Grünthal) draft bill, even though he supports the consensus decision to reject it. He openly describes the lively debate that took place in the commission and the positions held by various factions (Vilja Toomast, Varro Vooglaid). He promises to discuss the topic of legal aid costs in civil proceedings with colleagues in the future.
04.2024
9 Speeches
The cooperation style within the commission is consensus-based regarding procedural matters (e.g., appointing a rapporteur and adding a draft bill to the agenda), but it strongly opposes the opposition on substantive issues. It references previous failed cooperation during the initiation of a draft bill, which stalled due to the political narrative, demonstrating caution when seeking compromises on politically sensitive issues.
03.2024
2 Speeches
The speaker offers the opposition a direct political compromise on the tax bracket issue, calling on them to withdraw their draft bill in order to find common ground. While processing the legal draft bill, he notes the consensus decisions reached in the committee regarding the bill's further proceedings (the conclusion of the second reading and the final vote).
02.2024
16 Speeches
In committee work, he/she is ready for consensus on procedural matters (e.g., appointing himself/herself as rapporteur), but on substantive issues (e.g., oversight of the Prosecutor's Office), he/she takes a clearly partisan political stance. He/She proposes improving the oversight of the Prosecutor's Office by organizing a joint session of the Constitutional Committee and the Legal Affairs Committee, thereby demonstrating openness to institutional cooperation.
01.2024
13 Speeches
Participated in committee work when making consensus decisions (e.g., appointing the representative of the lead committee). Is prepared to publicly criticize the coalition partner (the Minister of Education) for the lack of reforms and the ambiguity of budget issues. Offers pragmatic advice to the opposition, suggesting that fewer slogans would help substantive draft legislation survive, noting that it takes two partners to dance the tango.