By Months: Valdo Randpere

Total Months: 17

Fully Profiled: 17

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
10.2025

2 Speeches

The style of cooperation involves formally addressing questions to the rapporteur covering the topic of economic development during the Riigikogu session. Information regarding broader cooperation initiatives or a willingness to compromise is unavailable.
Details View Details
09.2025

2 Speeches

Insufficient data.
Details View Details
06.2025

14 Speeches

The cooperative approach emphasizes the need for genuine collaboration between law enforcement agencies (the Prosecutor’s Office, the police) and the private sector (banks) in the fight against fraud. As a representative of the Commission, he/she stresses the importance of consensus decisions regarding the aviation security bill. However, he/she firmly supports the Legal Committee majority’s decision to reject the draft action plan, pointing out that the work is already in progress.
Details View Details
05.2025

4 Speeches

The style of cooperation is consensual and pragmatic. The speaker stresses that all decisions made by the steering committee regarding the handling of the draft bill (including placing it on the agenda, concluding the reading, and setting deadlines) were based on total unanimity and consensus. Their selection as the committee representative was based on competence, not quotas.
Details View Details
04.2025

5 Speeches

The speaker expresses strong support for the current Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs and the coalition, commending their willingness to address Estonia's adaptation in a changing world. They highlight the previous cross-party consensus achieved during the adoption of the "Estonia 2035" strategy (under the Ratas and Kaja Kallas governments), emphasizing that this unity has now vanished.
Details View Details
03.2025

5 Speeches

There is no data regarding willingness to cooperate or compromise. The speaker's style in this context is strictly confrontational and corrective.
Details View Details
02.2025

4 Speeches

The speaker heavily emphasizes consensus and cross-party cooperation, highlighting the "complete unanimity" achieved in the Legal Committee and even offering praise to traditionally skeptical colleagues. He also offered broad recognition to the Ministry of Justice staff (Andreas Kangur), the current minister, and former Minister of Justice Kalle Laanet for initiating the working group.
Details View Details
01.2025

2 Speeches

The speaker refers to the opposing party's previous period of reasonableness and conciliation, citing Mihhail Kõlvart, but observes that this period has now passed. There is no data regarding their current willingness to cooperate or their search for compromises.
Details View Details
11.2024

4 Speeches

The collaborative style is rather confrontational and didactic, focusing on correcting and refuting the opponents' viewpoints. Although respect is mentioned for the procedural role of one colleague (Kalle), direct cooperation or seeking compromise with opposing parties is not mentioned.
Details View Details
10.2024

1 Speeches

The speaker highlighted the successful and unanimous cooperation within the committee, which resulted in the decision to reject the draft bill. He/She referred to the views of other committee members (including Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart and Andre Hanimägi) which supported his/her position. This demonstrates a readiness for procedural cooperation and achieving consensus at the committee level.
Details View Details
09.2024

1 Speeches

The collaborative style is initially demanding and confrontational, insisting that the counterparty admit their mistake and revoke the decision. Nevertheless, the speaker proposes, as a solution, taking the matter into standard procedure. This suggests a readiness to accept the result following a proper vote, whichever way it may go.
Details View Details
06.2024

1 Speeches

Insufficient data
Details View Details
05.2024

4 Speeches

He acts in the commission as a mediator and clarifier, highlighting the substantive core of the opposing side’s (Kalle Grünthal) draft bill, even though he supports the consensus decision to reject it. He openly describes the lively debate that took place in the commission and the positions held by various factions (Vilja Toomast, Varro Vooglaid). He promises to discuss the topic of legal aid costs in civil proceedings with colleagues in the future.
Details View Details
04.2024

9 Speeches

The cooperation style within the commission is consensus-based regarding procedural matters (e.g., appointing a rapporteur and adding a draft bill to the agenda), but it strongly opposes the opposition on substantive issues. It references previous failed cooperation during the initiation of a draft bill, which stalled due to the political narrative, demonstrating caution when seeking compromises on politically sensitive issues.
Details View Details
03.2024

2 Speeches

The speaker offers the opposition a direct political compromise on the tax bracket issue, calling on them to withdraw their draft bill in order to find common ground. While processing the legal draft bill, he notes the consensus decisions reached in the committee regarding the bill's further proceedings (the conclusion of the second reading and the final vote).
Details View Details
02.2024

16 Speeches

In committee work, he/she is ready for consensus on procedural matters (e.g., appointing himself/herself as rapporteur), but on substantive issues (e.g., oversight of the Prosecutor's Office), he/she takes a clearly partisan political stance. He/She proposes improving the oversight of the Prosecutor's Office by organizing a joint session of the Constitutional Committee and the Legal Affairs Committee, thereby demonstrating openness to institutional cooperation.
Details View Details
01.2024

13 Speeches

Participated in committee work when making consensus decisions (e.g., appointing the representative of the lead committee). Is prepared to publicly criticize the coalition partner (the Minister of Education) for the lack of reforms and the ambiguity of budget issues. Offers pragmatic advice to the opposition, suggesting that fewer slogans would help substantive draft legislation survive, noting that it takes two partners to dance the tango.
Details View Details
Back to Profiling