By Plenary Sessions: Valdo Randpere

Randpere emphasizes the consensus decisions reached in the Constitutional Committee during the processing of the draft bill, including taking the bill onto the agenda and completing the first reading. This indicates procedural cooperation with the other committee members. A second speaker confirms the Reform Party’s strong support for the draft bill presented by the Minister of Justice, demonstrating strong intra-factional cooperation.

The speaker demonstrates a pragmatic approach by proposing a compromise regarding the name of the tax in order to alleviate political opposition and achieve the objective. He/She suggests that renaming the tax could cause opponents to soften their stance, indicating a desire to find a solution that would satisfy the state’s financial needs.

There is not enough data.

The speaker is serving as the representative of the Steering Committee, emphasizing the consensus decisions reached within the Committee (such as the appointment of a representative). They are open to streamlining the system, proposing joint committee sessions for the hearing of the Prosecutor General, which would ensure proper oversight without intervening in the administration of justice.