By Plenary Sessions: Valdo Randpere
Total Sessions: 30
Fully Profiled: 30
2025-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The collaborative approach is dialogic, involving posing a direct and substantive question to the presenter (Maris) regarding the concentration of the economy. The goal is to gain clarity on how both the presenter and the mayoral candidate view and would solve the problem.
2025-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, plenary session.
There is insufficient data.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The cooperative approach is conditional, first requiring the re-establishment of procedural correctness. If the procedure is right, a willingness is expressed to vote on the main issue according to the substantive preference ("we will vote this way, and if it doesn't work out, we will vote the other way").
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes the necessity of close cooperation between law enforcement bodies (the police, the Prosecutor's Office, and the Ministry of Justice and Digital Affairs) and the private sector (banks) when tackling fraud cases. He/She represents the majority view of the Legal Affairs Committee, which decided to reject the draft bill, demonstrating a readiness to consolidate the internal committee majority.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is highly consensual and collaboration-oriented, repeatedly stressing that all commission decisions regarding the further handling of the draft bill were made unanimously ("a consensual decision"). This demonstrates openness to cross-party cooperation on this specific issue.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The cooperation style is consensual and pragmatic, emphasizing that complete unanimity was achieved in the lead committee on all procedural matters (including placing items on the agenda, concluding the reading, and setting deadlines). The speaker notes that his appointment as rapporteur was also a consensual decision, based on his competence, rather than quotas.
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The speaker commends the Minister of Justice for his substantive presentation and his extraordinary patience in responding to questions. He/She stresses the importance of cooperation between the Riigikogu and the Government of the Republic in supporting strategic governance. He/She also points out that when the "Estonia 2035" strategy was adopted, there was initially near-total unanimity among almost all political parties.
2025-03-12
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
Not enough data.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker advocates for broad international cooperation among the Baltic Sea littoral states regarding infrastructure protection. He demonstrates pragmatic openness, suggesting that even Russia should be given the opportunity to join the agreement, as they also face infrastructure concerns in the Baltic Sea.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Highly cooperative, emphasizing that there was "complete consensus" on the draft bill in the Legal Affairs Committee, even among skeptical and critical members. He publicly praises both the current Minister of Justice, former Minister of Justice Kalle Laanet, as well as Ministry of Justice officials (Andreas Kangur) and other representatives of the legal sector (Supreme Court, Prosecutor's Office, Bar Association).
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
Information is unavailable. During this session, the speaker is primarily focused on correcting and confronting opponents.
2024-10-08
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker emphasized the strong cooperation within the committee, noting that the decision to reject the draft bill was "unanimous" and that the government also failed to support it. This demonstrates an ability to reach consensus on certain legislative matters, even when colleagues with differing viewpoints participated in the discussion (for example, Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart and Andre Hanimägi).
2024-06-04
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting
Insufficient information
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
He/She demonstrates a willingness to cooperate and adherence to procedural correctness, emphasizing that the decision to reject the draft bill was consensual within the committee, including with the support of Varro Vooglaid. He/She describes an open discussion that highlighted parallels with other draft legislation (for instance, Vilja Toomast’s reference to the hate speech bill).
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The cooperative approach refers to the desire to enhance collaboration between the Riigikogu and the Government, stressing that committees operating in accordance with the law should offer members of the Government the support required for their duties. This is a conditional offer of cooperation, which depends on the fulfillment of the committees' mandate.
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
There is no information regarding a willingness to cooperate or compromise. The speaker instead focuses on challenging existing decisions and demands unilateral intervention by the executive branch, specifically in the form of the minister's signature.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
He was consensually appointed as the rapporteur in the committee, which points to cooperation with the coalition partners. Previously, he initiated a draft bill in collaboration with another deputy, but in the current discussion involving EKRE, his style is rather confrontational and uncompromising. He highlights the consensual decisions made in the committee (e.g., placing the draft bill on the agenda).
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker detailed the consensus decisions made in advancing the bill through the plenary session (specifically, placing it on the agenda, concluding the reading, and the final vote). He/She noted the communication with Ministry of Justice officials and colleagues (Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart), but highlighted the failure of Mart Maastik's proposed amendment.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
The speaker demonstrates a conditional readiness for cooperation, calling on the opposing side to abandon its draft bill and support the abolition of the tax hump in order to find common ground. This indicates a desire to achieve consensus on their core issue, but it requires a political concession from the opponent.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Randpere emphasizes the consensus decisions reached in the Constitutional Committee during the processing of the draft bill, including taking the bill onto the agenda and completing the first reading. This indicates procedural cooperation with the other committee members. A second speaker confirms the Reform Party’s strong support for the draft bill presented by the Minister of Justice, demonstrating strong intra-factional cooperation.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates a pragmatic approach by proposing a compromise regarding the name of the tax in order to alleviate political opposition and achieve the objective. He/She suggests that renaming the tax could cause opponents to soften their stance, indicating a desire to find a solution that would satisfy the state’s financial needs.
2024-02-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
There is not enough data.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The speaker is serving as the representative of the Steering Committee, emphasizing the consensus decisions reached within the Committee (such as the appointment of a representative). They are open to streamlining the system, proposing joint committee sessions for the hearing of the Prosecutor General, which would ensure proper oversight without intervening in the administration of justice.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
He expresses respect for his colleague (Varro Vooglaid), noting that he has "learned to hold him in very high regard," even while criticizing the content of his question. He seeks to initiate a discussion or cooperation between the government and the City of Tallinn concerning the issue of the church property.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is insufficient data. (The interaction is limited to posing an official question to the head of government.)
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The style of cooperation in this context is confrontational, as the speaker is publicly criticizing a minister from the coalition partner, thereby calling into question their ability to implement reforms and maintain budgetary discipline. Instead of seeking cooperation, the minister is being pressed to act forcefully and independently.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
He represents the majority view of the steering committee, which decided to reject the draft bill (6 in favor, 2 against). He referred to the need for cooperation, stating that it takes two partners to dance the tango, implying that the opposition’s actions (the excessive submission of draft bills) are obstructing meaningful collaboration.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data. The speech is aimed at criticizing the opposition and exposing their activities, with no references to cooperation.