By Plenary Sessions: Vadim Belobrovtsev

Economic views focus on the balance between the revenue base and expenditures of local governments. He criticizes the state for not increasing the revenue base of local governments while their cost base and responsibilities are growing, especially in the field of education. He prefers clear and sustainable state funding instead of temporary grants from the European Social Fund (ESF+). The need to fund additional support specialists and social sector workers is emphasized.

The speaker opposes fiscal savings when they cause social harm, emphasizing that a saving of 21,000 euros does not justify negatively impacting 325,000 pensioners. Additional investments in IT resources are supported, where necessary, to ensure the quality and convenience of the service.

Advocates for greater regulation and accountability for financial institutions (banks), recommending considering legislation that would require banks to bear the losses resulting from fraud. This demonstrates a preference for consumer protection and stricter regulation of the financial sector to ensure the security of deposits.

The speaker is vehemently opposed to raising taxes, excises, and state fees, arguing that these measures worsen people's lives. He advocates for a pay raise for civil servants to compensate for the rampant inflation (food prices have increased by 40%). He prioritizes social concerns and improving the population's standard of living over fiscal discipline, which is achieved through cuts and tax increases.

Economic views are strongly opposed to tax and excise duty hikes, especially when they affect the less affluent population. They demand fiscal transparency and insist that dedicated taxes (like the security tax) be used strictly for their intended purposes, not just to plug budget holes.

The speaker rejects claims about the negative economic impact of the national holiday, arguing that the time off boosts people's productivity and compensates for the lost workday. The speaker is sharply critical of the government’s economic policy, which includes raising taxes, excise duties, and specialist doctor visit fees.

Economic perspectives emphasize the importance of economic growth and express deep concern regarding the prolonged (three-year) recession. The close ties with Europe are acknowledged, but the government is criticized for its inability to secure growth, which was simultaneously present in other European countries.

The budgetary perspectives are aimed at social justice and redistribution, emphasizing that those who earn more should contribute more. It sharply criticizes the government's austerity policy, which disproportionately affects the poorest and most vulnerable, although it acknowledges the necessity of keeping the budget balanced.