By Plenary Sessions: Vadim Belobrovtsev
Total Sessions: 9
Fully Profiled: 9
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
Cooperation is evident within the faction, as the speaker is acting on behalf of the Center Party faction, requesting a procedural recess. There is no information regarding open cooperation or willingness to compromise with the coalition or other factions.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
There is no indication whatsoever of cooperation or willingness to compromise; the speech is aimed at challenging the government's policy and demanding alternatives.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker represents the views of the Centre Party faction and works in cooperation with their fellow faction members, citing the faction's collective decision not to support the draft legislation. There is no evidence of a willingness to compromise with the coalition regarding either the bill under discussion or matters of parliamentary procedure.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
A collaborative style is absent, given that these are critical questions directed at the minister. However, the speaker capitalizes on internal disagreements within the ruling party, citing the views of Marko Mihkelson and Urmas Paet as a more rational alternative to Kaja Kallas’s approach.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Demonstrates cooperation with colleagues (e.g., Lauri Laats) in raising similar topics, referencing the indoor football arena initiative. Acknowledges the City of Tallinn's role in supporting sports organizations after the state terminated funding, thereby emphasizing the importance of local municipalities.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The collaborative style demonstrates engagement with colleagues, referring to the continuation of a question posed to the good colleague Anastasia, which suggests the existence of shared topic development. Data is missing regarding openness to compromises or cross-party cooperation.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The style of cooperation is cautious; the draft bill is supported by the Centre Party faction in the interests of teachers, but this does not imply cooperation with the government, whose actions are deemed ridiculous. There is no openness to compromises, as the focus is on blaming the government and demanding that teachers be valued.
2024-04-03
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker, acting on behalf of the Centre Faction, expresses support for the work carried out by the Social Democrat minister in the areas of Estonian security and integration. This indicates a selectively positive stance regarding the actions of specific ministers. Concurrently, the Social Democratic Party is being asked to take a clear position on the proposed voting rights bill and constitutional amendments.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Regarding cooperation, there is no information available concerning cross-party collaboration; instead, attention is drawn to internal coalition tensions, relaying the Prime Minister's alleged thoughts about coalition partners seeking political gain. Openness to compromise is not mentioned; rather, the focus is placed on condemning the government's actions.