By Plenary Sessions: Reili Rand

The political stance centers on deep concern over the slow implementation of the credit registry bill. The speaker stresses the necessity of protecting people from falling into debt bondage, proposing the establishment of a state-run registry and supplementary measures such as loan caps. This position is strongly policy- and results-driven, demanding faster and more effective government intervention.

The most prominent issue is the Competition Act, the adopted solution for which is heavily criticized for increasing the administrative burden and being ineffective. The political stance is oppositional and forcefully directed against the Reform Party, calling into question the alignment between the government's promises and its actual actions. Furthermore, the Prime Minister is criticized for their alleged distrust of the free Estonian press. The political framework is strongly performance-based, focusing on the government's inefficiency and contradictions.

The political stance strongly supports the establishment of a positive credit register, deeming it a long-awaited and commendable initiative. The primary point of concern, however, is the lengthy implementation timeline for the initiative (three years), which is considered excessive foot-dragging and contradicts previous coalition agreements. This position is geared toward supporting citizens in managing their debt burden and obligations, making it primarily policy- and results-driven.

The most critical issues are the prolonged processing of value-based legislative drafts (the Consent Act, equality laws) and the lack of transparency in the work of the Ministry of Justice. The political position is sharply critical of the minister’s inaction and secrecy, demanding concrete deadlines and substantive involvement. A gauntlet has been thrown down regarding the minister’s actions, which are considered closed-off and demagogic.

The political platform heavily emphasizes social justice and the financial stability of families, specifically calling for the abolition of kindergarten fees and the standardization of family benefits. The speaker opposes the government's tax policy, which disproportionately affects lower-income individuals, and criticizes the prioritization of security spending at the expense of social welfare programs. These positions are strongly value-driven, stressing that social security is an inseparable component of national security.

The speaker strongly emphasized the government's responsibility concerning the handling of the draft legislation and the incorrect transposition of the directive, which could result in fines for Estonia. Concern was also raised regarding the reduction of the Competition Authority's capacity to investigate cartels, linking this directly to the government's mandated budget cuts. The political focus is centered on evaluating the government's actions and accountability, particularly concerning procedural and financial risks.

The political focus is heavily directed toward reducing regional inequality and revitalizing the economies of peripheral areas, emphasizing the need to increase added value outside of Harju County. The speaker criticizes the government's inaction, particularly the directive from the Reform Party that shelved regional industrial policy, as well as the Infrastructure Minister's decision to terminate the rental housing program. The stance is strongly policy- and results-driven, demanding concrete state intervention measures.

The political position is strongly geared toward the immediate commencement of the Rohuküla railway construction. The speaker criticizes the government's inaction, stressing that the project is ready and all that is required is political will. The stance is results-oriented, focusing on the government's capacity to implement infrastructure projects and stimulate the economy.

The speaker supports additional funding for national defense but immediately stresses that people's livelihood and alleviating hardship for families are integral components of security. The political focus is directed toward supporting vulnerable groups and ensuring professionalism in social sectors (especially youth work) through clear standards. These positions are value-based, demanding decisive action and systemic solutions from the state.