By Plenary Sessions: Reili Rand

Economic perspectives emphasize strong state intervention in the financial sector to protect consumers from debt bondage. Regulatory measures are supported, such as implementing loan caps and advertising restrictions, demonstrating a preference for consumer protection over unrestricted market freedom.

Economic perspectives focus on regulatory efficiency, opposing solutions that increase the administrative burden and bureaucracy for both the state and businesses. Preference is given to simpler, clearer, and less administratively burdensome procedures, criticizing the government's chosen option as being more costly and inefficient.

Economic perspectives support regulatory measures (such as a positive credit register) aimed at improving loan servicing and helping individuals manage their financial liabilities. The emphasis is placed on mitigating social risk within the financial sector to foster a more stable economic environment.

Not enough data

The economic views strongly support social redistribution and the protection of lower-income individuals, while opposing a regressive tax system. The speaker is against the widespread implementation of casual employment contracts, arguing that this could deepen in-work poverty and eliminate social guarantees. They demand that the state cover long-term social expenditures and support the purchasing power of families.

Economic perspectives highlight the necessity of strong regulatory oversight, particularly concerning the investigation of cartel agreements. Concerns are being raised about the government's austerity policy, which diminishes the Competition Authority's ability to protect the economic environment and ensure fair competition.

Economic perspectives support the state's active involvement in guiding regional development and stimulating the economy in peripheral areas. The speaker advocates specific measures, such as tax incentives and infrastructure investments, to boost added value and competition outside the capital. He directly links job creation in the counties to the availability of state-supported housing.

Economic arguments strongly favor infrastructure investments, viewing them as a positive stimulus for the economy. The speaker prefers public spending, particularly on shovel-ready projects, in order to rapidly generate economic activity and prevent project delays.

It supports additional funding for national defense but simultaneously demands that the financial well-being of families be eased through social measures, such as greater compensation for school meals or the standardization of family benefits. It criticizes funding systems that are unsustainable and that reward the ability to write projects rather than addressing the actual financial need.