By Plenary Sessions: Henn Põlluaas

The opposition's stance is highly critical, accusing the coalition of engaging in "power politics" and using a "steamroller" to override the opposition. The criticism targets both procedural issues (the systematic rejection of substantive proposals) and policy matters (the Reform Party's tax hikes and the hypocrisy of the Social Democrats). The speaker is convinced that the coalition has absolutely no desire to cooperate with the opposition.

The main criticism is directed at the government and the ruling coalition, who are accused of dismantling the Estonian nation-state and prioritizing multiculturalism. The criticism is intense and politically value-driven, also accusing the coalition of running the economy into the ground and failing to support farmers. The opponents' worldview is considered irrelevant to the Estonian nation and culture.

Insufficient information

The main opponent is Kaja Kallas’s government and the coalition parties (Eesti 200, Social Democrats), who are accused of harming Estonian interests, incompetence, and corruption (Russian business dealings, theft of Ukrainian donations). The criticism is intense, ranging from political decisions (the closure of consulates) to personal ethical violations, and demands the government's resignation. The opposition is absolute, as the government has "led Estonia into the highest inflation and deepest recession in Europe."

The main opponents are ideological circles referred to as "extreme-left-green-liberals" and "eco-nuts," along with specific Reform Party members of parliament (Jürgen Ligi, Joller). The criticism is both procedural (misinterpreting the law) and personal/ideological, accusing the opponents of spreading conspiracy theories and deliberately misleading people. Compromise is ruled out, and the opponents' positions are deemed "absurd" and "nonsensical."

Insufficient data