By Plenary Sessions: Henn Põlluaas

The style is straightforward and critical, employing powerful metaphors (such as "steamroller," "wolf in sheep's clothing," and "the root of all evil") to critique the coalition and election lists. The appeals are primarily logical, centering on the necessity of stability and accountability, yet the tone is occasionally ironic and dismissive of opponents ("total rubbish"). It relies heavily on personal experience and statistical generalization, even though concrete data is not provided.

The tone is urgent, combative, and accusatory, utilizing strong emotional appeals to emphasize the threat to the nation-state. The government's actions are referred to as "criminal," and opponents are labeled "national renegades." The arguments are a blend of legal references, statistics, and sharp criticism, highlighting negative comparisons (e.g., the example of Latvia) and warning against Russification.

The speaker's style is formal, courteous, and businesslike, beginning by thanking the presenter for the substantive presentation and excellent answers. The rhetoric is geared toward a logical explanation, requesting a brief clarification of a complex economic question. The tone is rather conciliatory and information-seeking.

The rhetorical style is sharp, accusatory, and urgent, emphasizing the necessity of immediate action in the spheres of security and the economy. Strong emotional appeals are employed, linking the government's activities to corruption, untrustworthiness, and the betrayal of national interests ("shameful," "the lying Estonian government"). The speech is structured around a systematic critique of the government's four foreign policy pillars, utilizing both logical comparisons (Finland's defense capability) and outright accusations.

The style is highly combative, passionate, and at times sharp, mixing logical arguments (health risks, legal procedure) with strong emotional appeals (disgust, revulsion). Loaded ideological terms ("green crazies," "eco-fascists") are used, along with personal attacks directed at opponents, accusing them of demagoguery, "utterly stupid drivel," and low levels of competence. The speaker prefers storytelling (e.g., the potato salad example) instead of presenting dry data.

The speaker's rhetorical style is polite and respectful, addressing the presenter with the words, "Dear presenter!" and starting with thanks. The style is rather analytical and geared toward seeking the broader picture, emphasizing the international scope of the problem.