By Plenary Sessions: Henn Põlluaas

The speaker is open to discussion regarding the details of the draft legislation, but remains highly skeptical of the coalition, lacking faith in their goodwill or desire to cooperate. He notes that the coalition has rejected every bill and substantive amendment proposed by the opposition, which indicates a clear lack of collaboration. The overall stance is rather confrontational, viewing the legislative process as a sheer power play.

There is not enough data.

The collaborative style is very polite and appreciative, thanking both the presenter and Mrs. Potisepp for their substantive contributions. This demonstrates a willingness for constructive dialogue and respect for the other participants.

The current style of cooperation is heavily criticized, highlighting the fact that the government rejects all EKRE proposals, even those pertaining to national interests (such as funding consulates or denouncing the border treaty). Although the Riigikogu achieved consensus on supporting Ukraine, the government is being criticized for disregarding that unity (for example, regarding the no-fly zone). A broad-based approach is required when formulating the foreign policy doctrine.

The speaker referenced the positive feedback received in the committee regarding the necessity of the bill, noting that there were no objections raised. However, in the plenary session, the style of cooperation is confrontational and uncompromising, particularly when responding to questions that are considered malicious or demagogic.

The style of collaboration is open and supportive, expressing hope that the draft proposal will receive universal support. The speaker seeks to broaden the discussion by gathering insights through international cooperation and comparison.