By Plenary Sessions: Henn Põlluaas

The economic views focus on strong opposition to the government's tax policy (the car tax, "tax terror"), emphasizing the public's outrage. They also support cutting parliamentary expenses, demanding a reduction in expense allowances for Riigikogu members, and referencing EKRE's previous success in limiting car leasing amounts.

Insufficient data.

The speaker is strongly in favor of lowering taxes, particularly the VAT on groceries, in order to mitigate inflation and support domestic producers. He/She supports taking out a national defense loan to finance rapid and large-scale defense procurements, prioritizing swift, debt-funded investment over slow tax collection.

Not enough data

Strong opposition to the government's tax policy is evident in economic views, with the policy being labeled "tax terror" due to its negative impact on Estonian families. There is an apparent preference for a milder tax environment that would support the birth rate and the economic stability of families.

No data available. The discussions do not concern economic policy, taxation, or budgetary discipline, apart from a reference to fines for wearing the burqa, which is a social/law enforcement measure.

Insufficient data.

The speaker is a strong opponent of a broad increase in the tax burden, arguing that it stifles the economy and drives it into the ground. He supports taxing banks' extraordinary profits (a windfall tax), but opposes raising the car tax and other consumption taxes (VAT, excise duties). A clear analysis of the cumulative tax burden on the average car owner is being demanded.