By Plenary Sessions: Henn Põlluaas

Regarding one issue (national defense), recognition is expressed for the result achieved in the committee, describing it as "highly commendable" and inquiring about the potential for further development. In other matters (e-voting, expense reimbursements), the opposition stance and EKRE's historical resistance are highlighted, referencing earlier successes in reducing expense compensations.

There is not enough data.

The speaker emphasizes EKRE's role in improving the previous security document and calls for consensus on the national defense development plan so that it addresses actual threats. This demonstrates a readiness to cooperate on strategic national issues, despite the party's generally oppositional stance.

Not enough data

The speech reveals absolutely no openness to compromise or cooperation; rather, it is purely antagonistic criticism aimed squarely at the government.

The speaker’s style is rather confrontational. While he/she does call on all parties to support women's rights (in the context of the burqa ban), the overall emphasis is placed on the coalition's inability to cooperate and its tendency to ignore opposition bills. No willingness to compromise is expressed; instead, it is stressed that rejecting the bill reveals the coalition's "true colors."

Insufficient data.

Data is missing. The speaker positions themselves in sharp opposition to the government, and there are no signs indicating cooperation or compromise.