By Plenary Sessions: Evelin Poolamets

The primary confrontation is with the government and the Reform Party, who are accused of secrecy and concealing the truth from the public, citing the philosophy of tax hikes implemented after the 2023 elections. Criticism is also directed at members of the Riigikogu (Parliament), who are "immune to criticism" and tend to blindly follow European Union directives, thereby forfeiting Estonia's independent right to make decisions.

Strong opposition is directed at the government and the "liberal majority," who are accused of importing bureaucracy and taxes that burden Estonian businesses. Separately, Minister Joller is criticized for controversial stances (WHO, vaccination) and claims that contradict science. Brussels bureaucracy is considered the source of dangerous and "insane experiments."

The primary criticism is aimed at the actions of the minister and the government, who decided to cut subsidies for small-scale beekeepers without adequate impact analysis. The critique is policy-driven, focusing on unfair treatment, the disregard for regional development, and the state's failure to support rural life.

Criticism is aimed at the Reform Party-led government and its ministers, covering both policy issues (such as funding for bog restoration and the abolition of subsidies for small beekeepers) and procedural matters (the inactivity of the Population Committee). A separate, intense line of criticism focuses on the personal conduct of ministers (Ligi, Michal) toward female members of the Riigikogu (Parliament), demanding solutions to address this belittling behavior.