By Plenary Sessions: Evelin Poolamets
Total Sessions: 115
Fully Profiled: 115
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The primary criticism is aimed at the government, which is accused of failing to deliver results in family policy and of the declining birth rate. The criticism is intense and focuses on the ineffectiveness of the policy, rather than on individuals. The government is also criticized for denying economic data.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The opposition's stance is directed against a specific minister, sharply criticizing their personal and procedural conduct (the insulting of Helle-Moonika Helme). The intensity of the criticism is high, demanding the minister's immediate removal from the podium due to inappropriate behavior. The criticism is both personal and procedural.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The primary confrontation is with the government and the Reform Party, who are accused of secrecy and concealing the truth from the public, citing the philosophy of tax hikes implemented after the 2023 elections. Criticism is also directed at members of the Riigikogu (Parliament), who are "immune to criticism" and tend to blindly follow European Union directives, thereby forfeiting Estonia's independent right to make decisions.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Strong opposition is directed at the government and the "liberal majority," who are accused of importing bureaucracy and taxes that burden Estonian businesses. Separately, Minister Joller is criticized for controversial stances (WHO, vaccination) and claims that contradict science. Brussels bureaucracy is considered the source of dangerous and "insane experiments."
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the actions of the minister and the government, who decided to cut subsidies for small-scale beekeepers without adequate impact analysis. The critique is policy-driven, focusing on unfair treatment, the disregard for regional development, and the state's failure to support rural life.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Criticism is aimed at the Reform Party-led government and its ministers, covering both policy issues (such as funding for bog restoration and the abolition of subsidies for small beekeepers) and procedural matters (the inactivity of the Population Committee). A separate, intense line of criticism focuses on the personal conduct of ministers (Ligi, Michal) toward female members of the Riigikogu (Parliament), demanding solutions to address this belittling behavior.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the Reform Party government, "green transition fanatics," and wind farm developers (big industry). Criticism is directed both at the political course and the procedural side, accusing them of drafting the law at the behest of the developers and formally neutralizing the opinions of local communities. No willingness to compromise is expressed, with calls instead to vote against the draft bill.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
Not enough data.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary conflict is aimed at the minister, whose previous stance regarding the responsibility of nursing homes is being sharply criticized and called into question. The criticism is intense and focuses on political inaction and the avoidance of responsibility by the nursing home management. The opponent's position (likened to a stab wound) is used to refute the argument.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main adversary is the Reform Party government, which is accused of having a "massive wind energy obsession" and pursuing reality-denying policies. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, claiming that the government's energy policy has turned into a direct security risk. The opposition is uncompromising, demanding the halting of developments that compromise defense capabilities.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is strong opposition to the actions taken by the government and developers, who are being accused of greenwashing, unfair planning, and completely disregarding the community. The text sharply criticizes the lack of legal clarity and the fact that developers are allowed to commission their own environmental impact assessment studies. It also points to the Reform Party's previous economic policy blunders (raising excise taxes, economic recession) and criticizes officials for their prejudiced attitude toward health concerns.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The primary adversaries are the Ministry of Justice and the Prosecutor's Office, who are criticized for evading responsibility, inaction, and taking immoral legal positions. Minister Andres Sutt is also criticized for the lack of clarity in wind farm regulations and for relying on foreign studies. The criticism is intense and aimed at institutional failure.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Fierce opposition is aimed at the ruling coalition, especially the Reform Party, which is accused of breaking promises made to pensioners and burdening poorer people. Criticism is also leveled at the "European Union's leftist bureaucracy" and the ideological dreams of EU officials. The politician criticizes opponents for their lack of knowledge and indifference, demanding a permanent end to regulatory "stupidity."
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the Reform Party, who are accused of abandoning Southeast Estonia and pursuing a failed regional policy. The opposition is intense and highly political, criticizing the government’s plans (the introduction of cheap labor) as a short-sighted and detrimental path leading to the ruin of the nation-state.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at the Reform Party, citing the discrepancy in their gender equality policy and their practice of nominating only male candidates for high-ranking positions. The government's actions are also under fire for ignoring the Chancellor of Justice's warnings about the unconstitutionality of the state budget. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, and it also uses behavioral incidents involving well-known figures (Taavi Rõivas) to provide context for the draft legislation.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Strong opposition is aimed at the government's green transition policy and its economic implementation, which is criticized as being system-disrupting and serving the business interests of specific entrepreneurs. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, accusing politicians of causing real economic damage under the guise of green energy rhetoric. There are no signs of compromise; instead, the demand is for a complete change in the current course.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The main opponents are ideological movements that promote views based on gender as a social construct, referring to this as the feminist, postmodern, and Marxist perspective. The criticism is intense and value-driven, accusing them of replacing reality with an ideological scheme and blurring the lines between truth and feeling. The opposition is also directed at the Ministry of the Interior's policy, which permits name changes without a medical gender determination.
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The opposition targets institutional pressure and viewpoints that challenge the absolute nature of free speech, while indirectly criticizing the Prosecutor General's remarks concerning the initiation of criminal proceedings. The criticism specifically addresses the value-based and legal framework that permits penalizing individuals for holding "wrong viewpoints."
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the Reform Party and the government, who are accused of making decisions in the interests of the European Union’s green policy and big businessmen, rather than in the name of the people. The criticism is intense, accusing the opposing side of lying, ridiculing the people, and writing the draft bill at the behest of manufacturers. Compromise is ruled out, with calls to suspend the reading of the draft bill.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The opposition is directed at the claims made by the Commission's representative, particularly regarding the alleged lack of increase in administrative burden, which, in the speaker's view, contradicts the written information. The criticism is procedural and focuses on the inaccuracies and inconsistencies of the information presented, demanding clarification regarding the actual increase in workload.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at representatives of the Electoral Commission, who are accused of "ignorance" and incompetence. The criticism is intense and focuses on their professional competence and their attitude toward the legislative process.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The primary criticism targets the inaction of the minister and the ministry, who stand accused of taking insufficient measures and maintaining a passive attitude. The criticism is intense and highly political, casting doubt on the government's genuine willingness to seriously address the issue, especially since the ministry is only offering recommendations, not actual solutions.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary opposition is directed at the government’s energy policy and green targets, which are criticized for undermining the security of supply. The criticism is strategic and political, highlighting the dependence on external suppliers (imported gas) and the prioritization of ideological slogans over national interests. The opposition is intense and policy-driven.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Criticism is directed at the developers of the car tax and those who made subsequent amendments, due to the suspicion that the tax no longer fulfills its original environmental goals. The opposition is substantive, focusing on the policy itself and pointing to a discrepancy between the stated objectives and the final result.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main adversaries are the government and the developers (the "wind industry"). Criticism targets the government's foolishness or private interests (money laundering, greed), as well as the developers' manipulative studies, which cannot be trusted. The opposition is intense, focusing on policy and procedure, and accuses them of passing laws hastily and without proper impact assessments.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the Reform Party government and its ministers (Jürgen Ligi, Kristina Kallas), who are accused of neglecting the economy and pursuing an ideological agenda. The criticism is intense and ideological, specifically accusing the government of pressuring businesses with a €400,000 fine. Compromise is ruled out, as there is a proposal to reject the draft bill entirely.
2025-04-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the government and the minister, who are being criticized for their inability to effectively curb the massive wave of crime. The criticism is results-based, calling into question the adequacy of the measures the government has taken.
2025-03-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker is clearly playing an opposition role, criticizing the coalition's failure to deliver on promises to reduce the administrative burden. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, demanding answers on how to address the suspicions of unconstitutional conduct.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The main opponents are the Ministry of Climate, the Reform Party, and renewable energy developers among large corporations, who are accused of pursuing personal gain and disregarding national priorities. Criticism is strongly directed at the lack of transparency in the subsidy schemes and illegal activities (companies operating without a license). The speaker accuses the government of caring not about the Estonian people or the state, but about their "buddies," hinting at corruption.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the Reform Party, which is accused of discriminating against female colleagues and of hypocrisy regarding social policy issues. The criticism is intense and focuses on conduct, accusing the government of engaging in substitute activities instead of managing the economy. The motives of the opposing side are being questioned ("Are you trying to save face?").
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The confrontation is aimed at the rapporteur and the government, who are sharply criticized for their inability and unwillingness to resolve the issue of indexing reservists' compensation. The criticism is both political and procedural (citing delays and technical excuses) and is intense, openly expressing a loss of confidence in the opponent.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary adversary is the government led by the Reform Party, specifically referring to the administrations of Kaja Kallas and Kristen Michal. The criticism is intense and centers on a lack of political will and the inability to solve the demographic crisis, as well as inconsistency in security policy. The government is accused of abdicating responsibility and ignoring the demographic crisis in the coalition agreement.
2025-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at the Estonian Health Board and, more broadly, national health policy, which, in the speaker's assessment, has failed to acknowledge the dangers associated with COVID vaccines. The criticism is policy- and data-driven, calling into question the conclusions and actions of official authorities. The intensity of the criticism is moderate, expressed through direct questioning and the juxtaposition of data.
2025-03-12
The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The speaker occupies a critically oppositional stance, calling into question the reliability of the minister's promises and the transparency of strategic agreements. The criticism targets both the substance and the implementation of the policy, demanding evidence-based answers, particularly concerning the mitigation of environmental risks. There is no mention of seeking compromise; the focus remains squarely on demanding accountability.
2025-03-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponent is the Reform Party and former Minister of Economic Affairs Kristen Michal, who is accused of deliberately causing Nordica’s downfall with the aim of privatizing the company cheaply. The criticism is intense, focusing on management errors, the avoidance of responsibility, and a pattern where state funds vanish. The speaker also criticizes ministers who do not even bother to appear before Riigikogu committees to give an account.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary opponents are the government and its members, including Prime Minister Michal, the Ministry of Climate, and Minister Erkki Keldo. The criticism is intense and aimed both at political decisions (the 2.6 billion investment) and personal credibility, accusing officials of misleading the public and exaggerating data.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the mechanisms and potential risks of the draft legislation, not at individuals or political groups. Specifically, questions are being raised about how conflicts of interest will be prevented when providing paid services related to research ethics, and whether the wolf hunting policy might actually create more problems. There is no direct opposition or personal attacks; the focus remains on procedural accuracy.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Criticism is aimed at those who wish to grant voting rights to non-citizens, who are considered potentially under the influence of hostile forces or who do not value Estonian independence. The opposition is intense and touches upon both procedural issues (an odd amendment) and the fundamental principles of policy (the core of sovereignty). The speaker suspects the opposing side of acting under pressure stemming from false shame or political correctness.
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main opposition is directed at the government and the minister for establishing inadequate regulation in the energy sector, which has created legal and financial jeopardy for local municipalities. Strong criticism is also aimed at international wind energy developers (Sustainable Investments OÜ), who are being labeled as extortionists and shell companies demanding money unjustly.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary targets are the government and its leading members (the prime minister, Minister Jürgen Ligi, Siim Kallas), who face criticism both for the inefficiency of their economic policies and for their disrespect toward women. The criticism is intense, spanning from the political level to personal accusations of sexism and incompetence. The speaker is demanding that the government acknowledge its failure and that the leader's fitness for office be reassessed.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is directed against the government's policy, demanding quantitative justification for the necessity of the proposed legislative amendment. The criticism is policy-based and moderate, focusing on the lack of data concerning the scope of the problem that the law is intended to address.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The main opposition is aimed at the government's climate and tax policies, which are considered socially unjust. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the disregard for social consequences related to the taxation of large families, pensioners, and people with disabilities.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The criticism focuses on procedural deficiencies in the preparation of the draft legislation, particularly the absence of an impact assessment and the use of vague definitions. There are no direct personal attacks or naming of opponents; instead, the emphasis is placed solely on the necessity of improving the quality of lawmaking.
2025-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the actions of the government and the Ministry of Finance, particularly regarding their opposition to the bill currently under discussion and their plan to introduce a hybrid budget. The speaker references the government's official stance (a letter confirming they do not support the draft legislation) and calls into question the efficiency of the current activity-based budgeting system. The critique is both policy-driven and procedural.
2025-01-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Criticism is directed at the system that allows high-ranking state officials to receive undocumented salary supplements, which is considered humiliating and unfair. Skepticism is expressed regarding the support of other factions, despite the country being in a difficult economic situation. There is opposition to the secrecy and concealment characteristic of undemocratic states.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the government's energy policy, which favors intermittent energy production and spreads the myth that it is cheap. The opposition is both political and substantive, stressing that the current course will lead to energy crises, price shocks, and an increased environmental burden. Criticism is also directed at renewable energy producers, who should be responsible for bearing the additional CO2 costs resulting from this intermittency.
2024-12-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the concept of gender neutrality, which is being criticized on cultural and ideological grounds. The critique is presented more symbolically and humorously, rather than as a direct political attack against a specific policy.
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary groups facing criticism are the bill's proponents (the government/minister) and the wind energy developers, whose economic interests the draft legislation allegedly serves. The criticism is intense, targeting both the procedure (reduction of the EIA, rushing the process) and the underlying ideology ("climate activism"). Compromise is ruled out, as the EKRE faction opposes the bill and deems it unacceptable.
2024-12-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the bill's supporters in the Riigikogu and the Brussels bureaucracy, which is imposing ideological standards. The criticism is intense and ideological, accusing opponents of subjecting entrepreneurship to left-liberal values and communist practices. There is also opposition to the bill being processed in the Economic Affairs Committee, with the counter-proposal being the creation of an Ideology Committee.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The criticism focuses on the lack of clarity regarding the financial data and the distribution of costs presented by the rapporteur, particularly in the security and renewable energy sectors. There is no direct confrontation or personal attacks; rather, the demand is for clarification of the policy and greater specification of budget details.
2024-12-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The primary targets of the criticism are the Reform Party-led government, Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, and Minister of Social Protection Signe Riisalo. The criticism is mainly procedural and policy-based, accusing the government of bureaucratic stalling, confusing its priorities, and ceding control over population policy management. Specific criticism is leveled at the paralyzed operation and lack of transparency of the Government Commission on Population Policy.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at the authors of the draft bill and the committee’s rapporteur, who failed to answer simple questions or analyze the impact on SMEs. The opposition targets both the substance of the policy and the procedural rushing, which harms the business environment and creates unfair competition for local entrepreneurs. There is no mention of the possibility of a compromise regarding the draft bill in its current form; instead, they are urged to take a step back.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is directed at the government and the drafters of the bill, faulting them for misplacing priorities (simplifying bureaucracy at the expense of children’s safety). Regarding the second bill, he criticizes the minister for avoiding a direct economic assessment, suggesting the bill was poorly prepared ("cobbled together").
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Criticism is aimed at the presenter of the draft bill and the developers of the legal amendment, who are accused of ignorance and procedural failure. The opposition is based on both policy and procedure, focusing on the absence of an impact assessment and the failure to take consequences into account. The speaker notes that the consequences of applying for a grey passport were not discussed during the drafting of the bill.
2024-11-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at the Reform Party, which is accused of expanding its sphere of influence and centralizing power through the subordination of an institution with significant geological expertise. The criticism is political and procedural, calling into question the trust among coalition partners.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Criticism is aimed at the government's tax policy, which is described as having been introduced without impact analysis and via a "trial-and-error method." Previous economic arguments that blocked the addition of public holidays are also being criticized. Furthermore, the decline in work efficiency is linked to the increase in low-skilled foreign labor.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
The main opponent is the executive branch, particularly the prime minister, whose decisions made during his previous tenure as climate minister concerning the preparation of phosphorite studies are being called into question. The criticism targets the procedures, the lack of transparency, and the preference shown to foreign companies over Estonia’s own capabilities.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The address contains neither criticism nor opposition; it is a neutral political inquiry directed at the head of government. There is absolutely no reference to opponents or to policies under criticism.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the coalition parties, who are being criticized for their personal conduct and drug use. The criticism is intense and focuses on the ethical dimension, suggesting that their personal habits are influencing national decisions.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The confrontation is intense and directed at several ministers. Jürgen Ligi was criticized solely for his personal behavior, misogyny, and anti-women insults, with a long list of specific quotes being presented. The Minister of Finance was criticized for underestimating the role of parliament and disparaging the quality of the debate. The government as a whole is suspected of making illegal decisions in the context of reducing the influence of the Moscow Patriarchate.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the draft legislation initiated by the Government of the Republic and the transposition of European Union directives, particularly concerning sustainability reporting. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, focusing on issues of bureaucracy, costs, and sovereignty. The faction of the Estonian Conservative People’s Party proposed rejecting the draft amendment to the Accounting Act during the first reading.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The opposition is directed at the minister and the government's policy concerning the outsourcing of prison capacity. The criticism is policy-based, calling into question the project's feasibility and the safeguarding of human rights, while citing the differing laws and regulations of the host countries. The intensity of the criticism is strong, given that the project is being called a failure right from the outset.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is directed at the executive branch (the minister) because he failed to provide a clear answer regarding the scope of the taxation. The opposition is procedural and focused on policy clarity, rather than being personal.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The main adversary is the governing coalition and the minister, whose policies (tax hikes, excise duties) are being criticized both politically and ideologically. The criticism is intense, calling into question the government's commitment to the market economy and referencing the statements made by a coalition partner (Lauri Läänemets).
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The confrontation is aimed at the minister and the government's policy, criticizing both the substance of the social policy and its procedural shortcomings. The criticism is intense and focuses on the negative consequences of specific legislative amendments for mothers' health and employment. The opponents are accused of cruelty and failing to conduct impact assessments.
2024-10-09
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session.
The primary opposition is aimed at the Reform Party and the ruling coalition, who are accused of ignoring and exacerbating the demographic crisis through the cutting of family benefits and the increasing of immigration quotas. The criticism is intense and partly personal, pointing to the negative rhetoric of ministers and the honorary chairman of the Reform Party regarding children and large families. The speaker sees the government's actions as prioritizing the interests of entrepreneurs over national sustainability.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the minister and the government, who stand accused of poor planning and budget management. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, focusing specifically on the absence of concrete deadlines and the chronic underfunding of the road network. The intensity of the attack is high, strongly suggesting that the government is delivering empty promises.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The opposition is directed against the policy presented by the minister and the preparation of legislation, particularly regarding the claim of public transport’s environmental sustainability and the necessity of amending the laws. The criticism is substantive and procedural, not personal.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The main opponents are the bill's proponents and the "wind farm entrepreneurs," who are being criticized for greenwashing and wasting taxpayer money. The criticism is intense, focusing on political shortcomings, such as the short-term validity of the draft legislation and the economic inefficiency of wind energy without subsidies. The EKRE faction does not support the bill, which demonstrates a clear lack of willingness to compromise on this issue.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The main criticism is directed at Kaja Kallas’s government, which is accused of cutting family benefits, eliminating income tax breaks, and pursuing anti-family policies. The criticism is particularly intense towards the Minister of Social Affairs (Signe Riisalo) and other politicians, whose statements regarding motherhood and large families are considered cynical and disparaging. The government's actions are seen as creating uncertainty and discouraging people from having children.
2024-09-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
The main opponent is the Prime Minister and the Government, who are being criticized for the decisions and procedures surrounding the confiscation of the Lihula monument. The criticism is intense and focuses on the unlawfulness of the government's actions and the potential for constitutional breaches. The speaker suggests that the government was aiming to demonstrate the full extent of its power.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary targets of opposition are Kristen Michal’s government and the responsible ministers (Minister of Education Kristina Kallas, and the Minister of Climate). Criticism is aimed at political failure (specifically, the easing of the transition to Estonian-language education) and incompetence (the lack of data regarding the impact of bog restoration). Compromise is ruled out; they demand an end to the "dragging of feet" and the replacement of teachers with poor language proficiency with native Estonian-speaking teachers.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
The main confrontation is aimed at the individual facing the vote of no confidence, criticizing their political credibility and the consistency of their value judgments. The attacks are intense and focus on personal choices, such as switching political parties and visits to Russia.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The primary adversary is the government, specifically the Reform Party and Prime Minister Kristen Michal, whose grasp of the state budget is deemed overly simplistic. The criticism is intense, focusing on political incompetence, the ongoing economic downturn, and the ministers' limited experience working in the private sector. There is no expression of willingness to compromise; instead, they are demanding a fundamental shift in policy.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
The primary targets of criticism are the previous Reform Party government led by Kaja Kallas and its fiscal inertia, which drove the budget into a critical state. The criticism is aimed not only at political failure but also potentially at personal competence, specifically questioning the suitability of Yoko Alender, the head of the Ministry of Climate. The opposition is intense and accusatory.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The main criticism is directed against the justifications for the car tax presented by the Chairman of the Finance Committee and the government. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on a logical flaw in the tax structure that also taxes those who neither pollute the environment nor burden the roads.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The confrontation is aimed specifically at the minister facing the no-confidence vote and indirectly at the Prime Minister (due to threats). The criticism is intense and focuses on ethical violations, the party's funding ties to individuals suspected of corruption, and the use of ministry lobbyists (Sandra Särav). No willingness to compromise is evident.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the draft bill initiated by the Government of the Republic, specifically because the adoption procedure is considered flawed due to the lack of public debate. The opposition is strong and policy-driven, given that the speaker explicitly points out the bill’s potential harm to public health. There is no indication of a willingness to compromise, as the faction refuses to support the bill in its entirety.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The speaker clearly adopts a scrutinizing and critical stance toward the government, calling into question the minister’s claims regarding the flawless operation of the state system. The criticism is directed at the government’s administrative capacity and the functionality of the system.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The confrontation is aimed at both the minister's previous stances (on the issue of ensuring Estonian identity) and the decisions made by the Riigikogu committee, questioning their motives and consistency. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, accusing the state of facilitating a lawless situation and illegal immigration due to the absence of language requirements.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The confrontation targets the political position of the Social Democrats (SDE) regarding the issue of voting rights, aiming to expose inconsistencies in their interpretation of democracy. Furthermore, the minister is being pressured to provide clarifications concerning the investigation into national security and hybrid attacks. The criticism is both policy-driven and value-based.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The confrontation is aimed at the management of the legislative process, criticizing the decision not to subject the bill to a confidence vote, which would have averted the current dispute. The criticism is purely procedural, not personal.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The main opponents are members of the government: Minister Kristina Kallas, who is being criticized for failure, and the Prime Minister, whose conduct is deemed inappropriate. The criticism is intense and is aimed both at political failures and behavioral aspects.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The opposition is aimed at the minister or government that introduced the draft legislation, severely criticizing procedural deficiencies. The criticism centers on both policy and procedure, specifically highlighting the absence of an impact assessment and the arbitrary determination of fine amounts.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The confrontation is aimed at the current economic policy and its outcomes, particularly concerning the assertions that climate goals are supposed to have a positive impact on the economy. The criticism is specifically leveled against the stance taken by the President of the Bank of Estonia, but more broadly, it touches upon the management of the economic recession and the overall failure of the policy.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main opposition is directed at the e-voting system and its administrators (the National Electoral Committee, RIA), who are accused of lacking transparency, concealing technical errors, and maintaining excessive control. The Reform Party is indirectly criticized as the system’s primary political beneficiary, receiving a disproportionately large share of the vote. The criticism is systemic and procedural, focusing on a lack of trust and the risk of corruption.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
The main confrontation is aimed at the minister and the government, sharply criticizing unethical behavior and a conflict of interest during the execution of the state procurement. The criticism is both procedural (the biased nature of the tender conditions) and personal, touching upon the minister's previous work at Semetron and the spouse's involvement in the field hospital business.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The criticism is directed at the government or the ministry (minister) responsible for the content of the "Eesti 2035" development strategy. The opposition is policy-based, centering on the strategy’s shortcomings and the lack of goals regarding the preservation of Estonian children’s cultural ties. The speaker further criticizes the government’s inability to foresee measures for maintaining the cultural connections of other growing communities (Muslims) as well.
2024-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
Criticism is directed at the actions of the responsible minister (Signe Riisalo) and the Ministry of Social Affairs, particularly concerning the drafting of the new regulation on educational requirements. The opposition is intense and centers on procedural shortcomings (the absence of an impact analysis and proper inclusion/involvement) and political decisions (a fundamentally different approach to requirements for various groups of employees).
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The opposition is directed both at those who underestimate the prestige of the Estonian language and at members of parliament who disrupt the order of the session with rude comments and snickering. The criticism targets the procedure itself and the disregard for the seriousness of the topic (the Estonian language).
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The opposition is directed at the Prime Minister and the government's political rhetoric concerning the linking of the green transition and security. The criticism is policy-based, demanding a concrete justification from the government.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main confrontation is with the government and its ministers, who are criticized both for their political choices (sex education, family benefits) and their actions (failure to respond, unclear use of public funds). The criticism is intense and covers both substantive and procedural aspects, accusing the government of endangering children's safety and ignoring the demographic crisis.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the speed and methods of implementing the education reform, pointing out that transitioning to Estonian as the language of instruction in just a year and a half is too rapid. The opposition is politically motivated, focusing on the risk of declining quality and the shortage of specialists resulting from the government's decisions.
2024-04-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The opposing stance is directed at the Minister and the executive branch, whose verbal explanation is being called into question, citing the explanatory memorandum's contradictory content regarding animal-based food products. The criticism targets the policy's transparency, accuracy, and the obligation to inform consumers.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the government's policies, particularly the levying of the car tax without exceptions and the inconsistencies within the immigration policy. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, calling into question the government's calculations and the efficacy of the regulations. Furthermore, clarification is being demanded regarding the tax contributions made by Ukrainian men.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The opposition is directed at the draft legislation initiated by the government and, more broadly, at the European Union’s green policy, which is accused of issuing mandates and imposing prohibitions. The criticism is both political (concerning the violation of the principles of the rule of law) and procedural (concerning the lack of legal clarity). There is also criticism reserved for the Chancellor of Justice regarding the personal opinion he expressed on the topic of e-elections.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
A strong opposition stance is aimed at the government's tax policy and the reduction of family benefits, which is viewed as restricting family formation. Criticism is also directed at specific coalition politicians (Jürgen Ligi), concerning previous defense policy decisions and their impact on current development plans.
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
A strong opposition stance is aimed squarely at Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the coalition parties (Eesti 200, SDE), who are accused of disregarding ethical standards and involvement in funding scandals. The criticism is focused both politically (financing issues) and procedurally (the rejection of draft legislation), with the opposition demanding the vetting of government members' backgrounds.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opponents are the government and the prime minister, whose inability to halt sanctioned trade is being sharply criticized. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, calling into question the government's ability to fulfill its obligations regarding both the preservation of the nation and the enforcement of international sanctions.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at officials (the minister or the rapporteur) due to their inadequate preparation and ignorance regarding the full scope of the bills' impact, especially concerning the number of affected individuals or companies. The criticism is procedural and policy-driven, calling for accountability and clarity.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The criticism targets the government's policies and procedures, particularly regarding the potential social consequences of the education reform. Furthermore, a procedural flaw in the legislative process is being highlighted—namely, that not a single agricultural producer was invited to the consultation round for the biogas bill.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The opposition is aimed at the government and Finance Minister Mart Võrklaev, criticizing their economic governance and plans to implement a car tax. The criticism is political in nature, accusing the government of deteriorating the economic environment and undermining competitiveness. The opposition's stance is intense and involves the ridicule of political objectives.
2024-02-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the structure and ideological coherence of the Centre Party, rather than directly at its policies. The speaker notes with regret that the faction shrinking by more than half suggests the party was essentially an electoral alliance that fell apart once the specific issue disappeared. The criticism is structural and indirect.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is primarily directed at the actions of local authorities, who are accused of squandering taxpayer funds on the production and distribution of Russian-language informational materials. Furthermore, skepticism is being expressed concerning ERR's claim of political balance, with demands for research to substantiate it.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is directed at the ethical conduct of the government (specifically the prime minister) and the resulting consequences in foreign policy. The objection has been framed as a question, requiring the speaker/rapporteur to provide clarification regarding the scandal’s impact. Crucially, the criticism is substantive, focusing on the political fallout rather than mere procedures.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The main criticism is aimed at Interior Minister Lauri Läänemets, who is accused of breaking promises and inaction regarding both real estate restrictions and bank taxes. The criticism is intense and focuses on the government’s inability to assess and resolve security risks. Figures associated with corruption (Johanna-Maria Lehtme) are also indirectly criticized.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The confrontation is aimed at the prime minister and the government, who are indirectly criticized for the consequences of the immigration policy. The criticism is based both on the policy itself and its resulting consequences, linking immigration to the increased burden on public services.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is no direct opposition or outright attacks. Criticism is instead directed at ethical practices, specifically questioning the advertising of vaccines alongside other products. Inquiries are being directed towards the government, expressing a desire for clarity regarding the activities of the state fund.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main criticism is directed at the European Union directives and their forced implementation, which creates excessive obligations for homeowners. The criticism is policy-driven, highlighting insufficient funding ("a ridiculously small sum") and unrealistic goals. Also criticized are the objectives behind introducing the car tax, which fail to take regional specificities into account.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Data is scarce.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Strong opposition is aimed at the government, which has been dubbed the "Stark-Logistics Government," suggesting corruption and the serving of hidden business interests. The criticism is both procedural (citing the lack of a formal drafting intention) and substantive, accusing the government of fulfilling an "order." The opposition is intense and culminates in a proposal to reject the bill during its first reading.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
A strong oppositional stance is directed at the policies of the government (including Prime Minister Kaja Kallas), particularly regarding issues of immigration and demography. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the lack of control and potentially harmful consequences, such as a decline in the will to defend.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The criticism is directed at the current requirements and procedures of the Population Register, which create gender inequality and problems stemming from a lack of awareness for those giving birth at home. Specific political opponents or groups are not personally criticized; instead, the focus is on the unsuitability of the regulation.
2024-01-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The confrontation is aimed at Minister of Social Protection Signe Riisalo and the government more broadly, sharply criticizing the procedure and objectives of ramming through legislation. The government is accused of dividing society and using strong-arm tactics in the interests of a "small, marginal minority." The criticism is both procedural (failure to answer the interpellation) and substantive.