By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

The style is passionate, sharply critical, and rhetorically charged, utilizing strong historical parallels (Ernst Jaakson, the lighthouse of freedom) and metaphors ("the superweapon of a small state"). The speaker employs both emotional appeals (ingratitude towards the Estonian diaspora) and logical arguments (the positions of the Foreign Affairs Committee, economic damage). The personal criticism directed at the Foreign Minister is intense, calling him a "spice grocer" and accusing him of historical insensitivity.

The rhetorical style is critical, concerned, and confrontational, expressing the alarming nature of the overall situation and employing direct challenges ("Defend this position or explain it to the people..."). Logical appeals are utilized, referencing specific consequences (such as crippling industries) and contrasting official rhetoric (the green transition) with actual activities (mining).

The rhetorical style is extremely combative, accusatory, and demands immediate action, specifically the minister's resignation. Strong emotional appeals are employed, accusing the opponent of lacking basic knowledge and desecrating history. Logical arguments concerning legal violations are presented, but these are packaged within sharp and personal criticism.

The rhetorical style is urgent and demanding, stressing that the sector's development is moving at a feverish pace and requires immediate intervention. The appeal itself is logical, highlighting the economic accessibility of the drone industry and the necessity of supporting youth involvement. The address is delivered to the presenter as a formal question.

The rhetorical style is highly combative, accusatory, and demanding, employing emotional appeals and direct questions aimed at the prime minister. The speaker describes the removal of the monument as being "action-film style" and a "panic reaction." He uses repeated exclamations ("This is unacceptable! This is unacceptable!") to underscore the gravity and injustice of the situation.

The rhetorical style is highly combative, critical, and anxious, employing strong emotional appeals and hyperbole (e.g., "drowning money in a swamp," "exports falling like a stone"). Irony and satire are utilized, comparing the filling in of ditches to Tammsaare's characters and labeling politics as "Lysenkoism" and "bought-in ideas."