By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

The speaker is vehemently opposed to the current green transition policy and the development of wind energy, calling it "wind turbine folly" and "a scam." He emphasizes that state investments (2.8 billion euros in subsidies) are being directed to the wrong place, resulting in Europe's most expensive energy and the destruction of the economy. The political framework is strongly value-based (protecting heritage landscapes) and outcome-based (demanding the restoration of common sense and reliable analyses).

The political position is strongly value-based and oppositional, focusing on the protection of national culture (high culture) and opposing liberal "trash culture" and gender propaganda. The speaker criticizes the government for treating Ukrainian refugees merely as a labor reservoir, rather than respecting the national identity. The stance is strongly confrontational and accusatory, emphasizing an era marked by security threats and the decline of moral values.

The political position is heavily focused on the reliability and security of the electoral process, particularly concerning e-voting. The speaker sharply criticizes the current system, citing potential fraud ("double bottom") and the anomaly surrounding the Reform Party's electronic votes. The stance is procedure-based, urgently demanding the preservation of evidence to prevent its swift destruction.

The political position is strongly oppositional and results-oriented, focusing on the government's failures in the economy (three years of recession, tax hikes) and the reduction of sovereignty. The speaker forcefully opposes the green transition, labeling it neo-totalitarianism and a planned economy. There is also sharp criticism directed at the disintegration of the digital state and the legal system, highlighting the glaring contradiction between official documents and reality. The government's actions are described as a "factory of far-left ideas."

The political position is strongly opposed to the government-subsidized green transition and the development of wind farms, viewing it as a utopian continuation of the Soviet-era planning committee. The speaker emphasizes fiscal responsibility and sharply criticizes the loss of 2.8 billion euros from the public purse, calling into question the economic logic of the entire project. The stance is highly confrontational and focuses on highlighting the inefficiency of government operations and the risk of corruption.

The speaker is strongly opposed to the proposed car tax, offering a bank tax—following the Lithuanian model—as an alternative. He voices deep skepticism regarding the rapid and uncritical adoption of certain energy technologies (namely, hydrogen and giant wind turbines). His political stance is fundamentally value-based, centering on issues of historical corruption and technological inefficiency.

The political stance is heavily focused on maintaining allied relations with the USA, underscoring that the United States is a key democratic ally. The speaker sharply condemns ministerial-level statements that damage these relations, viewing such behavior as dangerous to the state and demanding the Prime Minister's intervention. A value-based approach is maintained, asserting that Estonia cannot afford to disparage its allies.

The political position centers on strong opposition to the use of the concept of social gender (gender) in legislative drafts, demanding the clear definition of traditional sexes (male and female). The speaker criticizes the government for aggressive ideological promotion and frames their stance through conservative values. The dispute over the bill's terminology is value-based and intensely confrontational.

The speaker is focusing on the government's failures regarding cyber defense and data protection risks, highlighting specific incidents such as the Apotheka data leak. There is strong opposition directed at the proposed hate speech law, which is viewed as a threat to free speech and a step toward Communist China-style censorship. The political position is strongly critical of the government’s actions and is value-based, centered on the protection of civil liberties.