By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

The primary groups under fire are "social justice warriors" who tackle violence against women incorrectly by introducing absurd social genders. There is also sharp criticism directed at allowing Putin-controlled immigration, which is actively undermining Estonian security. The criticism itself is intense and ideologically charged, casting doubt on the motives and actions of the opposition.

The primary target is the government and the prime minister, who face sharp criticism for their cynicism, ignoring the crisis of public trust, and inadequate national defense. The criticism is intense, spanning from mere political failure to a fundamental question of legitimacy, suggesting the need for snap elections. The speaker faults the prime minister for being vague and focusing on the root causes (Russia) instead of offering concrete solutions.

The criticism is aimed at the e-voting system and its lack of oversight, as well as the excessive power granted to experts, which could lead to "very interesting decisions." The objection is procedural, focusing on systemic flaws that erode public trust.

The main opponents are the sponsors of the bill, who are accused of callous opposition to reasonable arguments and unconstitutionality. Strong criticism is also directed at the Ministry of Defence’s administrative area for the lack of internal control and the chaos in basic records management. The attacks are intense and personal in nature (using the word "dense").

The main criticism is aimed at the government's policy concerning the bringing in of foreign prisoners and the implementation of asylum rights. The criticism is intense and politically driven, accusing the opposing side of creating security threats (radicalization) and ignoring warnings from the PPA. The opposition is absolute because the policy is importing murderers and rapists.