By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

The political stance is strongly focused on reducing security risks, particularly concerning Putin-controlled immigration from the eastern border, which is viewed as undermining national security. Intense opposition is also expressed to the concept of social genders and the relevant provisions of the Istanbul Convention, emphasizing the importance of conscience and truth. The political framework is primarily value-based and deeply concerned with security matters.

The political position focuses strongly on the crisis of democracy and state legitimacy, highlighting the growing distrust towards the government and elections. Furthermore, the speaker urgently calls on the government to take concrete steps to improve the nation's defense capabilities (anti-drone systems and surveillance) following a dangerous incident. The stance is strongly oppositional and centers on the failure of the government's actions (or inaction).

The political position centers on strong opposition to the current structure of e-elections, highlighting the lack of oversight and the excessive power granted to experts. This stance is critical both procedurally and on a matter of principle, underscoring the necessity for greater transparency. The primary concern is the destruction of e-votes within a short timeframe, which prevents subsequent security audits.

The political stance is strongly oppositional, centering on the criticism of the government's activities and proposed bills (such as those concerning taxation or the environment). They highlight the risk of unconstitutionality and the poor performance of the administrative sector (Ministry of Defence), particularly noting the absence of internal controls. The original purposefulness of the policy has been lost, with the desire to collect taxes being concealed behind the argument of environmental sustainability.

The political focus is heavily concentrated on national security and an anti-mass immigration stance. The speaker vigorously opposes the importation of foreign prisoners into Estonia (the prison project) and criticizes the implementation of asylum law, which allows alleged criminals to remain in Estonia. This position is primarily value-based and framed around security concerns, emphasizing the harsh consequences of the policy.