By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

The speaker demonstrates awareness of the specific provisions of the Istanbul Convention concerning gender issues and uses security-related terminology (FSB, agent filtering). The expertise is conceptual and suspicious from a security perspective, relying on anecdotal feedback regarding immigration, specifically the sighting of Russian Federation flags in refugees' homes.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the technical aspects of national defense, referencing improvements in drone and surveillance capabilities, and noting that a significant sum has been earmarked for this in the Ministry of Defense budgets. They also utilize public opinion data, pointing out that over 40% of people do not trust elections and that this percentage is rising according to repeated surveys.

The speaker demonstrates specific knowledge of e-voting procedures, pointing out a concrete flaw regarding the deadline for destroying e-votes (within one month after the resolution of complaints). It is emphasized that auditability remains exclusively in the hands of experts, and the need for subsequent verification is referenced, for example, by researchers from Tallinn University.

The expertise covers topics concerning European Union environmental taxation, CO2 taxes, and the transition to electric vehicles, with reference to the international context. Additionally, knowledge has been highlighted regarding issues in public administration internal control and document management (using the Ministry of Defence as an example), emphasizing the crucial importance of the internal controller during the movement of large financial sums.

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding security threats and prison systems, referencing PPA (Police and Border Guard Board) risk assessments and the radicalization observed in Swedish prisons. Specific terms such as "right to asylum," "radicalization," and "Salafist Islam" are used to substantiate the dangers associated with bringing in foreign prisoners. It is emphasized that background checks do not yield reliable results concerning radicalization.