By Plenary Sessions: Vladimir Arhipov

The speaker is participating in the energy policy debate in the Riigikogu, posing questions to the minister regarding the use of oil shale. Specific legislative initiatives or priorities are not mentioned.

It emphasizes the importance of legality in state security activities, specifically inquiring about the legal grounds for the operations. It demonstrates interest in adherence to the principles of the rule of law within the defense policy sector.

It focuses on issues of taxation and fiscal policy, particularly criticizing the government's policy of tax hikes. It demands clarification regarding the link between defense spending and the tax increases, and accuses the government of breaking its promises by making temporary taxes permanent.

It focuses on infrastructure policy and agricultural development. It raises questions regarding government measures and future plans, but specific legislative initiatives are not mentioned.

It focuses on education policy issues, particularly the regulations governing the recognition of specialist qualifications. It seeks solutions to the conflict between current requirements and practical possibilities.

It focuses on opposing the Churches and Congregations Act, emphasizing its unconstitutionality. It supports using existing legislation to combat anti-state activity, arguing that a separate law is unnecessary. It also criticizes the potential reform of religious holidays.

Due to the lack of data, it is impossible to draw conclusions regarding legislative priorities.

The speaker focuses on scrutinizing government policy and demanding alternatives. Regarding energy policy, they call for a referendum as a tool for democratic decision-making. In education financing, they advocate for the retention of basic state funding. The approach is one of oversight and scrutiny rather than legislative initiative, centering on government accountability.

It demands specific legislative changes: the automatic indexing of the subsistence benefit to the cost of living index, the digitalization of benefit applications, and the reinstatement of the benefit for single pensioners living alone. It focuses on reforming the social protection system and requires a clear action plan from the government regarding social affairs.

The focus is on enhancing the efficiency of supervision systems and improving inter-institutional coordination. The approach advocates for systemic reform, rather than the initiation of specific legislative changes.

Focuses on issues concerning social policy and economic legislation. Actively involved in discussions surrounding the unemployment insurance reform, the cybersecurity act, and the electricity market law. Poses detailed questions regarding the impact of legislation and demands precise explanations concerning costs and potential savings. Stresses the necessity of comprehensive impact assessments before any laws are adopted.

The focus is on tax policy, particularly the regulation of value-added tax (VAT) on foodstuffs. It puts forward a specific political proposal for VAT reduction, drawing on the experiences of other countries. It also shows interest in legislative measures designed to support the agricultural sector.

There is not enough data regarding specific legislative priorities.

The focus is on the legislative aspects of regional policy and social issues, seeking specific plans and measures from the ministers. It supports regional investments and the development of transport connections. Furthermore, it calls for faster decisions rather than prolonged analyses, and the implementation of practical solutions to address the problems faced by local governments and citizens.