By Plenary Sessions: Vladimir Arhipov

The speaker shows interest in affordable electricity, suggesting a focus on economic pragmatism. They specifically inquire about the financial impact of using oil shale on electricity prices, but refrain from taking a definitive stance.

Insufficient data.

The statement expresses clear opposition to tax hikes, particularly the increase of income tax and VAT to 24%. It demands state expenditure cuts and a fairer distribution of the tax burden, criticizing the current policy as detrimental to the working population. Furthermore, it questions the use of defense spending as a justification for these tax increases, suspecting that the real goal is merely general budget patching.

Supports the development of the agricultural sector and the involvement of young people in this field. It shows concern regarding the sector's attractiveness, specifically mentioning issues related to wages and image. It is interested in the interests of Estonian entrepreneurs in Ukraine, which indicates support for foreign trade.

Based on the data, it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding economic views.

There is not enough data.

It supports an active role for the state in mitigating economic hardship and strengthening social security. It emphasizes the necessity of protecting the elderly and low-income earners from the high cost of living, which points to support for a redistributive economic policy.

The speaker supports an active role for the state in the economy, demanding basic state support for education and warning against increasing energy dependence. The economic views emphasize maintaining competitiveness and ensuring energy security. The approach is pragmatic, taking into account the well-being of both households and businesses, but prioritizing state intervention.

The text supports a greater role for the state in financing social protection, demanding the automatic indexation of livelihood support benefits and the reinstatement of supplementary benefits. It criticizes inadequate public funding in the social sphere and stresses that the state must assume responsibility for offsetting the rising cost of living. It demonstrates clear support for redistributive measures.

There is not enough data.

Clearly left-leaning economic views, supporting progressive taxation and social welfare. Strongly opposes increases to VAT, excise duties, and the electricity tax. Criticizes "backward" economic policy and demands consideration of alternatives, such as a bank tax. Stresses the need to shield low-income individuals and pensioners from the effects of economic decisions.

It clearly supports reducing the tax burden in the food sector, demonstrating a more liberal economic stance. It stresses the necessity of supporting both consumers and local producers, thereby showcasing a balanced approach to economic policy. Furthermore, it criticizes tax hikes as measures detrimental to the economy.

It supports the social protection of pensioners and demands greater state responsibility in ensuring the livelihood of vulnerable groups. It expresses concern about the impact of inflation on people with fixed incomes.

The text criticizes the impact of inflation, taxes, and excise duties on the standard of living of ordinary people, citing examples of the diminished purchasing power of pensioners. It expresses concern over the rising costs of care homes and blames the failure of the social welfare reform. Furthermore, it emphasizes the need for public investments in regional development and infrastructure, while criticizing the "there is no money" rhetoric.