By Plenary Sessions: Andres Metsoja

The criticism is aimed at the actions of the government and ministries, which have resulted in the repeated drafting of bills that violate the constitution. Regulations are also being criticized for forcing old technologies (specifically, oil shale units) to utilize a non-existent best available technology, thereby damaging the reputation of the state-owned company. The criticism targets policy and procedural errors; it is not personal.

The criticism is aimed directly at Minister Läänemets, doubting his grasp of the market despite his leadership role at SMIT. More broadly, government members are being criticized for their inaction and for pointing fingers at each other instead of finding solutions. Market participants are also facing criticism for their unwillingness to implement the regulation concerning the cross-use of infrastructure.

The main targets of criticism are excessive state bureaucracy, slow processing times (30 days just to get a permit for a nuisance species), and the trend toward "total nature conservation," which pushes people out of natural areas. The criticism is intense, citing examples of absurd approval requirements that breed resentment and confusion among residents. He criticizes a system that treats citizens like they are idiots and teaches them helplessness.

The criticism is aimed at the inefficiency of the sector's management and implementation in Estonia, sharply questioning why the leadership in this area cannot cope with the task. The opposition is directed more towards systemic incompetence and the responsible officials who are unable to ensure that security measures function properly.