By Plenary Sessions: Andres Metsoja
Total Sessions: 79
Fully Profiled: 79
2025-10-14
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The opposition is aimed at the state's stance and policy, which permits the redistribution of ticket revenue among regions that already have completely free public transport. The criticism is policy-driven and focuses on the unfair procedure of the current funding system.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The sharpest criticism is aimed at the state's inaction and regulatory failures, particularly concerning frequency auctions where market participants were not assigned mandatory obligations. Telecommunications companies are also criticized for exploiting their monopolistic position in sparsely populated areas, raising prices while offering poor quality service.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The opposition is focused on the government's fiscal policy and budget management, specifically criticizing the inadequate funding for roads and the issue of dependency on subsidies. The critique is both policy-based and structural, raising serious doubts about the government's ability to meet its stated commitments.
2025-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the government, which is viewed as incompetent and responsible for the poor standard of living in Estonia. The criticism is intense and focuses on the government's inability to provide solutions and its role in driving the country into a stalemate.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The criticism is aimed at the current legal framework and its inherent illogicality, particularly concerning the mandatory separate insurance for trailers and the unreasonable requirements for driver's licenses. The opposition is rooted in policy and logic, viewing the current system as unjustified and unfair, which ultimately results in the implementation of more expensive compulsory insurance.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The main criticism is directed at the presenters of the bill (the government), accusing them of poor legal practice that instills uncertainty and distorts competition. The criticism is intense and focuses on political and procedural errors, especially the imposition of a retroactive payment obligation. No willingness to compromise is expressed, with demands being made that the bill not be supported.
2025-09-17
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.
The primary opponents are the government and the prime minister, whose policies have resulted in tax hikes, the withdrawal of essential services, and general chaos. The criticism focuses on political unfairness, particularly regarding the car tax, which disproportionately affects rural areas, and the government's failure to address the persistent issue of gravel roads. Furthermore, the state's proposal to cease centralized planning is being criticized for undermining public confidence.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The opposition is aimed at policies that restrict property rights, particularly in the context of environmental protection and Natura areas, which impede economic activity. Criticism is directed at the government's actions, which have created a situation where the labeling of landowners ("declaring them a kulak") is being discussed.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The criticism is directed at the existing legal framework and state decisions which have created gaps—for example, in the sale of national defense land, where the state can no longer have a say. The unjustified exclusion of the renewable energy sector from the integrated permit procedure is also criticized. This criticism is policy-based and focuses on injustice or unreasonable administrative burden, rather than on specific individuals.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the ministry or government that introduced the bill, specifically criticizing the procedural aspect of retroactive implementation and the lack of thorough analysis. While the ministry's efforts to amend the draft were recognized, the final proposal is resolutely rejected because, as they put it, "the numbers just don't quite add up."
2025-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
Criticism is aimed at legislative procedures and government actions that disregard industry sector feedback during the drafting phase. There is opposition to empty, rehearsed talking points that fail to bring about progress, noting that their time is past.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the actions of the state and the government, which are characterized as an unsystematic, unequal, and distant partnership with local municipalities and residents. Developers are criticized for opposing the bureaucracy that would otherwise guarantee residents a sense of security. The criticism is primarily procedural and political, accusing the state of abandoning communities to face large-scale developers alone.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
There is no direct confrontation, but criticism is aimed at the potential inefficiency of the government’s planning and funding decisions. Specifically, questions are being raised about the sensibility of designing separate bridges in Pärnu and the use of the national defense fund for building shelters for cultural sites.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The speaker sharply opposes the government and its environmental policy, criticizing draft legislation 610 and 612 as irresponsible and infringing upon property owners' rights. The criticism focuses primarily on policy and procedure, faulting the failure to assess impacts and citing unequal treatment compared to other instances of expropriation for public interest.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The primary criticism is aimed at the actions taken by the Government of the Republic and its ministries concerning the implementation of environmental restrictions. This criticism is both policy-based (citing economic damage) and procedural (pointing to the lack of an impact assessment and restricted public access to documents). The opposition is strong and has been expressed directly to the Prime Minister.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is directed at the procedural ambiguity and the diffusion of responsibility in planning, particularly within the administrative area of the Ministry of Regional Affairs and Agriculture. Direct political opponents are not named; instead, the focus is placed on the consequences of the procedural changes.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the government coalition's inaction and sluggishness in the process of amending the Hunting Act, noting that the coalition could have been more proactive and swifter. He/She emphasizes the opposition's role in the Riigikogu (Parliament) in initiating legislation. The criticism is political and procedural, not personal.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Criticism is aimed at state-owned enterprises (Elering, Elektrilevi) for their monopolistic and obstructive practices, which make the entire energy issue too complex to grasp. Political inertia and resistance to proposals (such as exempting consumers from renewable energy fees) are also being criticized. Furthermore, the elitist attitude toward residents of sparsely populated areas is specifically condemned; these residents are viewed as having lower levels of education and awareness.
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The confrontation is aimed directly at the government's policy, as represented by the Minister, criticizing the lack of regional balance and the inefficiency of funding for culture and sports. The criticism is policy-driven and focuses on negative consequences, such as the shrinking number of participants and the challenges confronting local municipalities.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the state's energy policy and the activities of the state-owned enterprise Enefit Green, particularly concerning failed market investments and the continuing need for subsidies. The speaker criticizes a system that permits investments to be made "against the market" and fails to guarantee direct benefits for local residents. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The opposition targets Bill No. 612, which was submitted to the Riigikogu by the government, criticizing both its substance and strategic foundation. The critique is policy-driven, raising questions about how this change in ownership policy is consistent with the nation's core strategies.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main criticism is leveled at the government coalition, which is accused of implementing flawed taxes (the car tax) and lacking strategic vision, focusing only on short-term fixes. The criticism is rooted in both policy and competence, stressing that the coalition's tax logic (replacing one tax with another) is fundamentally wrong. The speaker argues that a normal compromise regarding the car tax is impossible because the tax is inherently flawed.
2025-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
There is no direct opposition, but critical questions are being raised regarding the speed and transparency of the planning process, demanding clarity on how potential conflicts (such as those involving renewable energy stakeholders) will be resolved. It is acknowledged that there are local skeptics who are concerned about safety and the impact on their own backyard.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at questions voiced in the Riigikogu chamber, which accuse the Estonian state concerning the issue of citizenship, labeling the situation as infuriating. During the second debate, the bill's proponents were criticized for providing an incomplete analysis and for introducing the regulation (the ban on the ODEX method) in an unclear manner that increases overall costs.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed against the bill initiated by the Government of the Republic, citing duplicity and insufficient impact analysis. It criticizes those who use the argument of reducing administrative burden as a "smokescreen" to avoid substantive discussion regarding the prohibition of drilling methods and the related costs. Furthermore, the state's inconsistent attitude toward local governments is criticized (specifically, concerning land tax versus the right to decide on mining operations).
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.
The primary criticism targets the ruling coalition, citing misplaced priorities (preferring cultural infrastructure over road maintenance) and a failure to address the inequities of the energy market. As a result of the government's policies, road infrastructure has been relegated to the "role of the stepchild." The criticism is policy- and results-based, demanding a complete reassessment of priorities.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Criticism is directed against plans for the centralization of regional administration, which are linked to the ideas of either the current government or the "previous coalition." The opposition is political and strategic, questioning the foundation and purpose of the plans while highlighting local resistance.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the state and the ministries for their inaction and lack of coordination, which creates conflicts (e.g., the planning conflict with ELF) and leaves communities struggling. It is especially criticized that ministry representatives failed to show up at the local meeting, resulting in small investments being left unmade. The criticism is procedural and policy-related, not personal.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is directed at the general unevenness of Baltic cooperation and the slow progress of the Rail Baltic project, but not at specific political opponents or groups. The criticism is rather procedural and results-based.
2025-01-29
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at the actions of the government and ministries, which have resulted in the repeated drafting of bills that violate the constitution. Regulations are also being criticized for forcing old technologies (specifically, oil shale units) to utilize a non-existent best available technology, thereby damaging the reputation of the state-owned company. The criticism targets policy and procedural errors; it is not personal.
2025-01-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The criticism is aimed directly at Minister Läänemets, doubting his grasp of the market despite his leadership role at SMIT. More broadly, government members are being criticized for their inaction and for pointing fingers at each other instead of finding solutions. Market participants are also facing criticism for their unwillingness to implement the regulation concerning the cross-use of infrastructure.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main targets of criticism are excessive state bureaucracy, slow processing times (30 days just to get a permit for a nuisance species), and the trend toward "total nature conservation," which pushes people out of natural areas. The criticism is intense, citing examples of absurd approval requirements that breed resentment and confusion among residents. He criticizes a system that treats citizens like they are idiots and teaches them helplessness.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the inefficiency of the sector's management and implementation in Estonia, sharply questioning why the leadership in this area cannot cope with the task. The opposition is directed more towards systemic incompetence and the responsible officials who are unable to ensure that security measures function properly.
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The opposition targets the initiators of the draft legislation and the car tax policy, which is considered politically unsound and likely to generate inequality. The criticism is rooted in policy, focusing on weak solutions concerning property rights and the unfair effect of the tax. Compromise is ruled out since the faction does not support the bill as a whole.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary opposition is focused on the government’s draft Subsoil Act, which is criticized for violating the principles of the rule of law and unfairly treating the private sector. The criticism is both political and procedural, accusing the state of abandoning businesses to bear the costs and business risks alone, while simultaneously creating market distortions in favor of the state-owned company (Enefit) when allocating oil shale resources.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The opposition is centered on strongly criticizing the quality of the government's policy and legislation, particularly concerning the motor vehicle tax and amendments to the Waste Act. The criticism targets both the political dimension (the unfairness of the MVT) and the procedural level (a vague legal framework, insufficient protection of property rights). Furthermore, it criticizes the state's attempt to offer assistance only after the unfair tax has already been imposed.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at the state budget handling process and the responsible authorities who fail to meet agreements and unexpectedly end up with large surplus sums. The criticism is procedural and non-partisan, focusing on the lack of transparency and accountability within public administration.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Criticism is aimed at the government and the drafters of the bills, pointing out procedural errors, such as failing to involve the opposition during the drafting phase of the constitutional amendment bill. The confrontation is intense, with critics accusing the government of destroying stability and making the state unreliable, because the amendments were made "on emotion" and lack substance. There is also an element of personal irony regarding the handling of the bill, which seems to revolve around a single individual.
2024-11-20
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.
The standoff is directed against the central government and the prime minister, criticizing their inability to provide regulatory certainty in the energy sector and the unfair budget cuts imposed on rural areas. The criticism is politically and procedurally justified, focusing on the creation of bureaucracy and the lack of a comprehensive picture.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the ruling coalition, accusing them of shattering public trust, ignoring the concerns of entrepreneurs, and governing the country without any clear vision. The criticism is intense, focusing on both procedural flaws (stakeholder involvement occurs only at the last minute) and substantive errors (replacing necessary budget cuts with tax increases). The government's actions are being labeled as "extremely poor state management."
2024-11-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The opposition is directed against the draft bill (the creation of the Land and Spatial Planning Agency) and the consequences of the previous administrative reform (2017), which created a vacuum in planning. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, emphasizing that the proposed solution does not guarantee legal clarity or familiarity with local conditions. It criticizes the state's actions, which create conflicting priorities (e.g., renewable energy and bog restoration in the same areas).
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the governing coalition, which is being criticized both for procedural shortcomings (speed, failure to assess the impact) and for bad tax laws. The criticism is intense, implying that the government might be planning even greater tax hikes if the current flawed law is overturned. The criticism is clearly based on policy and procedure.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The opposition is aimed at the government's package of tax increases, particularly the motor vehicle tax law, the repeal of which the speaker's represented party (Isamaa) is demanding. The criticism is both political and substantive, questioning the taxes' contribution to the development of Estonia's economic environment.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
The criticism is aimed at the government's inaction and illogical decisions, particularly concerning the closure of the education network and the appropriation of cash flows from RMK (State Forest Management Centre). It criticizes the Social Democrats (Sotsid) for dragging out the issue of voting rights and for their vague handling of the party's value framework. It further notes that the opposition (led by Isamaa) has offered solutions to urgent issues, which the coalition has failed to utilize.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the governing coalition's policies, particularly concerning the motor vehicle tax and the funding of public transport. The criticism is sharp, labeling the political decisions as unfair and foolish, and also criticizing the legislative procedure itself (omnibus bills). The opposition is policy-driven and focuses on the inefficiency of the government's actions.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at Minister Jürgen Ligi, who is being criticized for the philosophical belittling of parliament. The criticism is intense and procedural, asserting that such conduct must result in a motion of no confidence. The opposition focuses on the government member's attitude toward the legislative branch.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at the government and the minister, focusing on political and procedural deficiencies, particularly the ambiguous distribution of powers and the inefficient use of budget funds during the crisis. The opposition is policy-driven, questioning the legal foundation and economic viability of the reforms.
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The main criticism is aimed at the government and ministers (including Prime Minister Kristen Michal), criticizing their tax policy and the alleged continuation of the "tax festival." The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, focusing on the reduction of the local government revenue base, the violation of autonomy, and the mandatory increase of the land tax.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the government's economic philosophy, which presupposes adapting to high input costs (electricity, fuel). The criticism is policy-driven, warning that this approach damages the economic space and will result in manufacturing leaving Estonia.
2024-10-09
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session.
There is no direct confrontation or personal criticism, but the speaker is indirectly criticizing the current social welfare system for being overly focused on institutional care centers. The criticism is aimed at structural shortcomings, not specific individuals.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the government and "Tallinn," which are criticized for failing to grasp regional specificities. Furthermore, the former prime minister is criticized for negatively characterizing the residents of Southeast Estonia. The critique covers both policy matters (the ineffectiveness of support payments) and procedural issues (the risk of increasing bureaucracy).
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
Criticism is directed at the initiators of the draft legislation, faulting them for a poor overall vision, disproportionality, and ignoring community opinion. He criticizes the bill, arguing that it sends a provocative signal to society and could actually end up doing a disservice to renewable energy production. The speaker also opposes the radical polarization between supporters and opponents of renewable energy.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Criticism is aimed at the government's actions, which involve planning extensive nature conservation restrictions (12,000 ha) without the necessary budgetary resources to pay compensation. The opposition is focused on policy and procedural matters, emphasizing fiscal responsibility and highlighting budget deficits.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The primary criticism is leveled against the actions of the minister and the government, whose decisions concerning the closure of Paikuse College and significant investments are deemed unreasonable. The criticism is rooted in policy and budgetary concerns, questioning both the necessity and the timing of these decisions during a difficult period.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The opposition is directed at decisions made by the government or ministry concerning the closure of security agencies in Pärnu, a move considered detrimental to the region. The criticism is policy-based, emphasizing the negative impact these decisions have on internal security and defense capability.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
The confrontation is aimed at the Social Democrats ("sotsid"), whose stance on the issue of voting rights for Russian citizens is being utilized as the basis for political opposition. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on positions related to loyalty and security. Furthermore, a clear distinction is demanded between the views of the official and those of the Social Democrats.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The main criticism is aimed at the government's policy, which is blamed for creating instability and deteriorating the economic environment. The criticism is policy-driven, particularly concerning the plans for the motor vehicle tax and the organization of public transport. Furthermore, no willingness to compromise has been expressed, as supporting the draft bill is considered impossible.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
The main opponent is the governing coalition and Prime Ministerial candidate Kristen Michal, who is being criticized for his tax policy (the sweetened beverage tax, tax increases) and for delaying important legislative documents. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, directly asking why certain taxes were prioritized over others and whether there is a problem with the coalition partner. The idea behind one of the taxes was called foolish from the start.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The primary criticism is aimed at the state and the legislature for imposing taxes and regulations that burden property owners (such as the increase in land tax and restrictions related to the green transition). The criticism is policy- and procedure-driven, accusing the state of failing to compensate for the income lost due to protected areas and creating absurd bureaucratic hurdles.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Strong opposition to the government, criticizing its decision to implement a blanket car tax that fails to solve the actual pollution problems. The criticism targets the illogical nature of the policy (Porsche vs. Land Cruiser) and the fact that it taxes the lifestyle of rural residents who have already invested in compensating for the lack of state services. The speaker also calls the draft bill an act of Estonian political foolishness.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the state's inaction in boosting the revenue base of local municipalities and against the state for forcing local governments to cover the compensation for land tax on protected areas. The criticism is rooted in policy and procedure, highlighting the state's inability to fulfill its promises.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is leveled against the state bureaucracy and the Ministry of Climate, accusing them of internal contradictions and an inability to ensure a balance between competing interests. The opposition is both procedural and political, focusing on the disregard for agreed-upon planning and the allocation of EU funds to projects that actually impede development. The speaker also criticizes environmental protection agencies for prioritizing the restoration of wetlands at the expense of previously agreed-upon energy development.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The opposition is directed at the government's policies, especially the introduction of the sugar tax. The criticism is policy-based, accusing the government of using ineffective and simplistic instruments to achieve its goals, instruments which ultimately fail to change consumer behavior.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at the current legal framework, which allows the state to cause significant legal interference during the planning procedure, while enabling private owners to avoid initiating a new detailed plan. The criticism also indirectly targets the Riigikogu’s earlier decision not to proceed with the draft bill, and the committee, which failed to reach a firm consensus on the necessity of the legislative amendment. The criticism is directed at procedures and policy.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at local school boards and municipalities that are proposing the creation of exceptions which undermine the national rule for transitioning to Estonian-language instruction. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, focusing on the dangers of inconsistency.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the government/minister, who is accused of assisting regions only when it serves the realization of state interests, rather than fulfilling local needs. The criticism is both procedural and political, focusing on the lack of dialogue and centralized decision-making processes.
2024-04-03
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Criticism is aimed at the government and the agencies implementing regulations (such as the Labour Inspectorate) for imposing restrictions that impede the creation of a revenue base. This opposition is policy-driven, emphasizing that excessive regulation and sanctions damage small businesses and force them to look for foreign labor.
2024-04-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The primary opposition is directed against the government’s proposed car tax bill, criticizing it as a politically unjust and irresponsible measure that ignores the realities of rural areas. The criticism is substantive and intense, with compromise ruled out, and promises made to fight against the adoption of the law.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism targets the sluggishness and inefficiency of the state planning processes, which has caused confusion among local municipalities and residents. It is noted that judicial intervention at the Supreme Court level has become commonplace, indicating a need to review these processes.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The criticism is directed at the ambiguity of the draft provisions and the complexity of administrative procedures, especially regarding the coordination of exceptions with the Health Board. There is no direct opposition to specific political groups or individuals; the focus is on procedural shortcomings.
2024-03-13
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The speaker is acting in an opposition capacity, addressing questions to the Prime Minister regarding the actions of the government's executive level and the safeguarding of the stability of the rule of law. The criticism targets the inconsistency and ambiguity created by the government, which has fueled suspicions of political interference. The attacks are procedural, not personal, and demand that the situation be brought under control.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The confrontation is aimed squarely at the government and the minister in question, who are held responsible for the car tax and policies detrimental to rural life. The criticism is intense and focused purely on policy, accusing the state of branding rural residents as polluters and effectively taxing their way of life.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at Europe's collective action, which is considered overly passive and slow in implementing economic sanctions. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the West's inability to adapt to changes and step outside its comfort zone. The delay in sanctioning Chinese companies is highlighted separately.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The standoff is aimed at the government coalition's policies, criticizing their financial rationale and inconsistencies in budget management. Particular emphasis is placed on the coalition partners' public statements regarding cuts and finding resources to raise teachers' salaries, calling into question their actual commitment to austerity.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Criticism is directed at the actions and goals of the ruling coalition, particularly regarding innovation and budget balance. The speaker questions the government's calculations and demands proof to ensure that the economy's competitiveness is not harmed. The government's innovation policy is deemed insufficient and merely symbolic.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at the government and the minister (Mart Võrklaev) for their lack of vision and investment plan regarding the restructuring of the electricity grid. Specific dissatisfaction is highlighted concerning the failure to implement the issue of cross-usage, a matter that has been known in legislation for a long time. The criticism is policy- and results-based, underscoring the lack of accountability in developing this crucial infrastructure.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The main criticism is directed at the government and ministers, who are accused of lacking a clear economic plan and having caused the unfavorable economic situation. The criticism is policy- and results-based, focusing on high borrowing costs, an ambiguous industrial policy, and permitting procedures that increase investment risks. The intensity of the criticism is moderate yet demanding, while simultaneously emphasizing the need for a common solution.
2024-01-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is directed at the deficiencies of the legal framework and the procedural handling by the Economic Affairs Committee, which failed to involve the National Defence Committee and the Environment Committee. The speaker suggests that the bill may have gone unnoticed "in the wake of obstructionist bills" and that the committee did not fully grasp the substance of the draft legislation.