By Plenary Sessions: Andres Metsoja

Criticism is directed at the actions and goals of the ruling coalition, particularly regarding innovation and budget balance. The speaker questions the government's calculations and demands proof to ensure that the economy's competitiveness is not harmed. The government's innovation policy is deemed insufficient and merely symbolic.

The criticism is aimed at the government and the minister (Mart Võrklaev) for their lack of vision and investment plan regarding the restructuring of the electricity grid. Specific dissatisfaction is highlighted concerning the failure to implement the issue of cross-usage, a matter that has been known in legislation for a long time. The criticism is policy- and results-based, underscoring the lack of accountability in developing this crucial infrastructure.

The main criticism is directed at the government and ministers, who are accused of lacking a clear economic plan and having caused the unfavorable economic situation. The criticism is policy- and results-based, focusing on high borrowing costs, an ambiguous industrial policy, and permitting procedures that increase investment risks. The intensity of the criticism is moderate yet demanding, while simultaneously emphasizing the need for a common solution.

The criticism is directed at the deficiencies of the legal framework and the procedural handling by the Economic Affairs Committee, which failed to involve the National Defence Committee and the Environment Committee. The speaker suggests that the bill may have gone unnoticed "in the wake of obstructionist bills" and that the committee did not fully grasp the substance of the draft legislation.