By Plenary Sessions: Andres Metsoja

The rhetorical style is analytical and critical, calling into question the actual impact and depth of policies, using the expression "the problem is much deeper." The speaker employs logical appeals and demands specific data (for instance, the figure demonstrating the budget's harmfulness), while simultaneously maintaining a formal address to the session chair and the prime minister.

The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and compelling, blending detailed policy issues with emotional appeals aimed at ensuring justice and national integrity. Strong contrasts are drawn between urban and and rural development (e.g., the 15-minute city versus 72 hours without power). Although the tone is critical, it is emphasized that the topic is not about stirring up trouble or being malicious, but rather requires a logical and team-based solution.

The style is formal, analytical, and concerned, emphasizing economic logic and data rather than emotional appeals. An urgent tone is employed to underscore the crisis situation and the government's inaction, posing sharp rhetorical questions about the economic recovery plan. The speaker relies heavily on the positions of business organizations, lending significant weight to their critique.

The style is serious, businesslike, and at times urgent, emphasizing the severity of the problem and the need to "immediately liquidate" it. Logical appeals are used to demonstrate the inconsistency and "paranormality" of the legal situation, citing examples (Pärnu, Nursipalu) in support of the legal arguments. The speaker apologizes if the introduction of the topic in the committee remained unclear, but confirms that it was "explained quite simply and straightforwardly" in the main hall.