By Plenary Sessions: Andres Metsoja

Strongly supports boosting economic competitiveness and providing entrepreneurs with the confidence needed to invest in innovation. It considers economic growth the main prerequisite for achieving budget balance. It critically questions the impact of the tax-free per diem, assuming that it supports international competition.

Supports large investments in the electricity grid (up to €1 billion needed), while acknowledging that network tariffs cannot remain static, even as there is a desire to simultaneously lower electricity prices. Consideration is being given to listing the grid company on the stock exchange to raise additional funds, and emphasis is placed on the potential for cost reduction through the cross-utilization of infrastructure. Concern is expressed that the investment gap is too large to be covered solely by current network tariffs.

Strongly supports the promotion of economic growth and investment, demanding the achievement of budget balance through clear economic decisions. It is critical of capital outflow and high borrowing costs, and calls for a stable industrial policy and the reduction of investment risks (e.g., criticizing the use of fixed-term permits). It clearly represents business interests, emphasizing the necessity of certainty and trust for rational entrepreneurs.

Economic positions emphasize fairness and proportionality in land valuation, contrasting with the practice where the state utilizes national defense zoning plans to artificially inflate the land's value before selling it at auction. The objective is to prevent private entities from purchasing development rights that have been created under the national defense zoning plan.