By Plenary Sessions: Tiit Maran

The focus is on national forest policy and Estonia's nature conservation regulations, as well as the impact of European Union regulations on Estonia. The need to obtain analysis from Finland, Sweden, and one other country is mentioned, which demonstrates the necessity of international comparison.

The focus is on the national level and the organization of the state as a whole, while simultaneously emphasizing the need to consider the interests of local municipalities and communities in national governance. Specific regional projects or industries are not highlighted, apart from a reference to the interests of the forestry sector.

The focus is strongly regional, centering on the future of the Hiiumaa and Suuremõisa vocational school and the needs of local businesses. It is stressed that educational institutions in the regions hold greater significance than simply being a cog in a mechanistic system.

Insufficient data.

A strong regional focus is prominent, emphasizing local capacity and willingness to support defense activities specifically in the context of Nursipalu. He/She also expressed concern regarding specific animal incidents on Hiiumaa (the Kõpu peninsula). He/She strongly urges that environmental and nature education centers be properly established and represented in the regions, not solely in Tallinn.

The focus is on national energy policy (nuclear power plant preparedness) and international comparisons (reference to Canadian costs).

The focus is exclusively on national laws and policies (forestry, environmental fees, climate law). There are no references to specific regional industries or local communities, apart from the amendment to the Local Government Organization Act.