By Plenary Sessions: Tiit Maran

It focuses on the protection of existing nature conservation regulations and the oversight of government institutions (the State Chancellery) when concluding contracts. It acts in the role of a controller, demanding explanations as to why an analysis aimed at reducing bureaucracy regarding the designation of forests as protected areas was commissioned.

The primary focus is on the mandate, rules of procedure, and transparency issues concerning the Government-established Council of Entrepreneurs, demanding regulations to prevent conflicts of interest. Criticism is also leveled at the termination of strategic state governance documents (such as the forest development plan) and the halting of environmental policy.

The legislative focus is directed towards ensuring the substance of the decisions made by Riigikogu committees and guaranteeing the oversight of ministerial activities. The priority is finding a sustainable funding model for the Suuremõisa Vocational School, which was a promise made by the Culture Committee.

The focus is more on defining the foundations of the policy and initiating a substantive debate (regarding the content of "good education"), rather than on presenting specific legislative bills or amendments. The objective is to establish a consensus-based understanding of societal priorities.

The focus is on demanding the correct implementation of existing laws (the Planning Act) by the government. Emphasis is placed on the importance of court decisions in overturning government decisions, which points toward the supervision of legal compliance rather than the initiation of new legislation.

The legislative focus addresses the necessary legal framework required for the readiness of the nuclear power plant and the establishment of the operating entity. The speaker is interested in the relationship between the regulatory framework and the state's financial obligations.

The legislative focus is on demanding progress regarding the Climate Act and the re-initiation of the amendment to the Local Government Organization Act (the 'Vicious Dogs' bill), as it had previously stalled. The speaker is acting as the proponent, submitting interpellations and demanding clarity from the government concerning the content and schedule of the draft legislation.