By Plenary Sessions: Tiit Maran

The criticism is aimed at members of parliament who present claims that are either unfounded or outright false, seemingly living in "two different realities." There is also strong opposition to those who doubt the anthropogenic causes of climate change and those who disregard scientific consensus, with emphasis placed on the fact that such conduct is inappropriate within the honorable chamber. The criticism is primarily focused on ensuring factual accuracy and procedural fairness.

Criticism is aimed at the economic framework presented by the Prime Minister, which is viewed as isolated and inadequate in its consideration of the social and natural environment. It also indirectly criticizes those who tell "fairy tales" about the consequences of aggression, stressing that making concessions to the aggressor increases the risks facing Estonia.