By Plenary Sessions: Tiit Maran

Direct political opposition is not voiced, but procedural criticism is being raised concerning the bill's first reading. The criticism stems from the fact that the input of local governments, which is essential for the law's implementability, was disregarded during the initial reading.

Criticism is aimed at the rushed emergency processing of the draft bill, particularly regarding amendments to the Nature Conservation Act that are not directly related to the Kevadtorm (Spring Storm) exercise. Concern is expressed that during deliberations between the Minister of Defence and the Environmental Board, defence interests may override the interests of the living environment, pointing to potential scandals.

The criticism is directed at the inconsistencies and potential flaws within the draft legislation, not at specific opponents or political groups. The intensity is low; the goal is to obtain clarification and amend the law.