By Plenary Sessions: Tiit Maran

The speaker relayed criticism from the Ministry of Climate and other parties regarding Draft Bill 567, which centered on undefined terminology (such as 'nuisance specimen' and 'game animal') and the insufficient implementation of preventive measures. The criticism was policy- and procedure-driven, stressing that the bill might allow people to vent their anger on large predators and that violations occur even in cases involving otherwise trustworthy citizens.

There is no direct opposition, but the speaker questions previous assertions regarding the simplicity and low cost of nuclear waste storage. The criticism is aimed at inconsistencies in political claims and the policy-driven underestimation of costs.

Criticism is directed toward irresponsible dog owners, who are considered the real culprits behind dog attacks, rather than the dogs themselves. The current situation is also criticized, specifically where local municipalities have been "powerless" to prevent these incidents, pointing to shortcomings in the existing legal framework.