By Plenary Sessions: Tiit Maran

The style is highly formal, procedural, and neutral, fitting the role of a rapporteur who provides an overview of the proceedings within the committee. The speaker concentrates on logical arguments and the synthesis of facts, strictly avoiding personal emotional appeals. The repeated assertion that the responses are limited solely to what was discussed in the committee demonstrates prudence and fidelity to the assigned role.

The rhetorical style is polite and complimentary, beginning with praise for the presentation ("a superb presentation"). Subsequently, the style shifts to critically questioning, focusing on logical contradictions and inconsistencies within the political arguments, seeking comment on the "strange contradiction."

The style is formal, thorough, and academic, utilizing extensive historical and biological explanations to establish a broader context for the subject matter. The discourse balances logical arguments with personal experience (raising wolf pups). Towards the end, the tone becomes urgent and concerned, stressing the immediate need to expedite the legislative amendment to prevent further attacks.