By Months: Tiit Maran

Not enough data.

The speaker demonstrates cooperation with colleagues by submitting an interpellation to the Honorable Minister on behalf of ten members of the Riigikogu. The speaker also emphasizes the need to respect and adhere to the unanimous decisions of the Riigikogu committees (such as the Cultural Affairs Committee) concerning regional education.

There is no sign of cooperation with the governing coalition, but rather sharp confrontation. It points to cooperation with the Social Democrats regarding the re-submission of the "vicious dogs law amendment." It supports the debate of diverse viewpoints within academic freedom and, following the Danish model, an agreement between the state, businesses, and employees to balance society.

The speaker is acting oppositionally, noting that the coalition's power games are rejecting substantive proposals. He/She acknowledges an internal conflict regarding supporting the necessary legislative amendment if it fails to resolve the injustice inflicted upon landowners. He/She emphasizes the need to involve scientists, environmental experts, and trade unions in the decision-making process.

Demonstrates a readiness for constructive cooperation within the legislative process, recognizing that the draft legislation improved during the proceedings (for instance, the banning of a dangerous drilling method). However, they remain highly critical and oppositional towards the government's overall political direction, accusing them of lacking any substantive understanding of the issues.

The collaborative style is supportive, acknowledging colleague Raimond’s work on the dog bill and referencing feedback from supporters. As the committee rapporteur, he is procedurally correct, directing complex and open issues (e.g., the regulation of nuisance specimens) to the large carnivore cooperation body for further discussion. He emphasizes that his responses are limited by the committee’s discussion, which demonstrates dedication to the rapporteur role.

The speaker highlights the Environmental Committee's consensus decision on the further processing of the wolf bill and confirms the Social Democrats' support for the draft legislation. He/She is open to future cooperation concerning broader legislative amendments (the Nature Conservation Act, the Hunting Act) but prefers to maintain the focus of the current urgent bill.