By Plenary Sessions: Mart Maastik

The primary resistance is directed at the bill's proponents and the government's policy, which is accused of short-sightedness and serving vested interests (sponsors). Foreign companies are also criticized—referred to as "some company from another country"—for building expensive parks whose profits are ultimately paid for by Estonian taxpayers. The attacks are policy- and procedure-based, especially concerning the acceleration of environmental impact assessments.

The primary opposition is focused on the tax policies of the prime minister and the government, criticizing political decisions (specifically, the abolition of the tax hump) for undermining economic competitiveness. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, accusing the government of ignoring the situation and "burying its head in the sand."

The speaker is clearly taking an oppositional stance, challenging the border settlement mentioned by the government (or the minister). The criticism is rooted in both policy and substance, demanding detailed clarification and transparency regarding the government’s plans.