By Plenary Sessions: Mart Maastik

The rhetorical style is critical, skeptical, and at times emotional, employing strong language and rhetorical questions ("Where is the 'green thinking' in this!"). The speaker uses a moral framework ("The end justifies the means") and contrasts logical cost accounting with the government's inadequate narrative, while simultaneously emphasizing the concerns of local residents (the indigenous population).

The rhetorical style is sharp, critical, and confrontational, posing a direct question to the Prime Minister about the policy's justification. Ironic animal metaphors ("chicken-moose," "squirrel-ostrich") are employed to ridicule the opponent's positions and highlight their incoherence.

The style is formal and respectful (in addressing the Chair and the Minister), yet the content is direct and demanding. Rhetorical questions are employed to compel the Minister to clarify the vague solution by presenting sharp, contradictory scenarios.