By Plenary Sessions: Mart Maastik
Total Sessions: 7
Fully Profiled: 7
2025-01-29
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker supports the Chancellor of Justice's proposal for resolving the Iru case but adds a stipulation regarding the need to review the methodology for subsidies. He/She also agrees with the views of the previous speaker, Aleksandr Tšaplõgin, concerning the impact of renewable energy fees in creating unhealthy competition.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The collaborative style is dialogical, involving asking the rapporteur and colleagues specific and pointed questions. The goal is to obtain clarifications and highlight the tax's deficiencies, not to seek a compromise regarding the tax itself.
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The speaker expands upon a colleague's question concerning offshore wind farms, demonstrating cooperation within the faction. There is no information available regarding cooperation with the government or other political parties.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The speaker refers to a colleague’s (Karmen Joller) previous stance regarding the scarcity of funds, utilizing it to support their argument. There is no direct indication of a willingness to cooperate with the government on this issue; rather, it involves posing a challenging question to the government representative.
2025-01-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker acknowledges the contributions of other colleagues and quotes Helir-Valdor Seeder, demonstrating cooperation with colleagues who share a similar value framework. A willingness is expressed to consider alternative solutions for solving the birth rate problem, should they be proposed, but it is emphasized that action must be taken.
2025-01-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is formal and conditional; while agreement is expressed regarding the objectives of the draft legislation, issues requiring immediate amendment are subsequently raised. This cooperation is aimed at improving the quality of legislation through critical analysis, necessitating a broader and more systematic approach.