By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Läänemets

The speaker demonstrates a high level of expertise in economic and tax policy, utilizing studies from the OECD and IMF and presenting detailed statistical data on wealth distribution in Estonia (e.g., the wealthiest 10% own 66.8% of the total wealth). He also shows authority on internal security matters, referencing his recent position as Minister of the Interior and citing the opinions of police experts regarding cybersecurity.

The speaker demonstrates a thorough understanding of the procedural process under the Competition Act, referencing the transposition of the directive and the specific nature of competition law. They are well-versed in the history of the draft legislation, including the previous positions held by the government, the State Chancellery, and the Economic Affairs Committee. The speaker highlights the significant expertise of former Prime Minister Kaja Kallas in competition law to reinforce the criticism concerning the change in position.

The speaker demonstrates authority on matters of internal security and legal issues, citing their previous experience as Minister of the Interior and their knowledge of the threat assessments issued by the Security Police and the regular Police concerning Swedish prisoners. Awareness is also shown regarding the government's internal processes, the evolution of competition law, and the resource challenges facing mental health services. The speaker leverages their former official position to enhance the weight of their arguments.

The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in the process of implementing competition law and European Union directives, detailing the legislative history of the draft bill, political obstruction, and lobbying pressures. Furthermore, they are proficient in tax and financial policy, citing analyses from the OECD, the IMF, and the Bank of Estonia concerning regressivity, wealth inequality, and investments in human capital. They also exhibit knowledge of labor law and the dynamics of dialogue between social partners.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge regarding the financing of early childhood education and the differences in tuition fees between local governments, citing the 178-euro fee in Rae municipality as an example. They emphasize the economic benefit of investing in education, calling it an investment in people from which the state stands to gain in every possible way.

The speaker demonstrates competence in the legal system and court administration, discussing issues like workload, budget cuts, and technological advancements (AI). Furthermore, they are well-versed in the widespread societal impact of labor relations and socio-economic inequality, citing the Praxis study. They are capable of linking macroeconomic decisions (such as cheap labor) to specific social and legal challenges.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge regarding the legal restrictions faced by the local government (Tallinn) and the necessity of expanding the powers of the municipal enforcement unit (Mupo). They also highlight the ability to connect the issue of public order with the conditions required for fair economic competition. Furthermore, the speaker refers to the government's explanations concerning the draft legislation and expresses doubt about the capacity of Tallinn's legal team to interpret the law correctly.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in transport and infrastructure issues, citing their previous membership on the Traffic Commission and their knowledge of the stages of railway construction (design, land clearing). They are also well-versed in housing policy solutions, such as regulating rental prices and building municipal housing.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge in the social sphere, particularly concerning the history of establishing support for extracurricular activities and the regulation of the commercial aspects of welfare services. They present an authoritative understanding of the principles of the rule of law, stressing the separation between the government and the prosecution. Furthermore, they reference development plans and previous political agreements, indicating a systemic awareness of governmental work processes.