By Plenary Sessions: Irja Lutsar

There is insufficient data.

There is not enough data.

No criticism is directed towards specific opponents or groups. The speaker neutrally addresses concerns raised by bodies such as the Association of Cities and Municipalities (e.g., labor shortage), viewing these issues as problems requiring solutions, rather than acts of opposition. There is a complete absence of aggressive or confrontational rhetoric.

The opposition is aimed at the initiators of a specific draft law, criticizing their proposal due to political inconsistency, vague wording, and the potential for causing social harm. The criticism is sharp and policy-based, stressing that the bill would publicly shame women and punish them twice over. Varro Vooglaid’s stance is also referenced, but the main focus is on opposing the changes to funding.

The criticism is primarily aimed at the metrics established by the government or ministry and the implementation of activity-based budgeting. The opposition is both procedural and policy-based, focusing on the fact that the current system is dysfunctional and requires a complete overhaul. Specific political opponents are not named; instead, the poor design of the system itself is being criticized.