By Plenary Sessions: Irja Lutsar

Total Sessions: 5

Fully Profiled: 5

2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The political emphasis is placed on mitigating climate change, directly linking it to global population growth. The necessity of more effective population growth restraint and conscious resettlement is questioned, indicating a strong value-based approach to solving the climate crisis. The speaker presupposes that climate change is anthropogenic, which defines their political focus.
2024-11-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The most prominent topic is increasing the autonomy of the Academy of Sciences, which is strongly supported and viewed as a welcome political direction. Attention is also focused on legislative procedures and the intensity of committee work. The approach is rather policy- and procedure-focused.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The political stance is strongly supportive of Draft Law 500, which aims to improve the capacity of local governments (KOVs) to provide mental health care. This position is policy-driven, emphasizing the shift in the funding scheme from a project-based approach to a population-based formula that includes both a floor and a ceiling. The speaker considers this move the right direction for improving public services, especially in smaller municipalities.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political stance involves strong opposition to the proposed bill, which seeks to alter the current abortion funding mechanism by shifting the financial burden onto the woman herself. This opposition is principled, centered on issues of social justice, preventing the stigmatization of women, and mitigating public health risks (specifically, illegal abortions). The stance is clearly driven by policy and values, emphasizing the bill's inconsistency when compared to other essential healthcare services.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political stance centers on criticizing activity-based budgeting and its associated metrics. The speaker argues that the current metrics are flawed and unrealistic, particularly in the field of health promotion, where results cannot be achieved in the short term. This position is strongly outcome-based, emphasizing the necessity of deriving concrete benefits from financial investments (e.g., healthier people).