By Plenary Sessions: Tõnis Lukas

The primary conflict is with the government, which is being criticized for a border policy that the speaker believes is dangerous and based on illusions. The criticism is directed at the political decision to leave the border partially open, a move that invites security threats and organized crime.

The main criticism is aimed at the government and the Minister of Justice, citing procedural errors (the ignoring of the Tartu City Council) and an overly simplistic approach. The criticism is intense, focusing on both politics and procedure, and accuses the government of "steamrolling" the residents of Tartu. Compromise has been ruled out, as the demand is for the rejection of the draft bill during the first reading.

The main criticism is levelled against the actions of the minister and the government, citing procedural errors, such as insufficient public notification before the agreement was signed. The government is also criticized for its inconsistencies and contradictions when justifying the options for prisoners to seek asylum.