By Plenary Sessions: Tõnis Lukas

The rhetorical style is critical and direct, employing logical argumentation to highlight the security threats that arise from keeping the border open. The speaker utilizes a rhetorical question to scrutinize the government's assumptions regarding the loyalty of the Ida-Virumaa populace and the actual impact of the policy.

The rhetorical style is critical, cautionary, and argumentative, emphasizing potential dangers and burdens for Estonian society. Both logical arguments (jobs, budget, Swedish demands) and emotional appeals (the threat of gang violence, a new subculture, the feeling that the people of Tartu have been steamrolled) are utilized. The tone is formal yet sharp, criticizing the Minister of Justice's "doctrinaire attitude."

The style is formal, critical, and strongly interrogative, directed straight at the minister. Logical and procedural appeals are utilized, emphasizing references to facts ("it is a fact") and contradictions among government members regarding the possibilities of applying for asylum. The tone is concerned and demanding, focusing on ensuring security and legality.