By Plenary Sessions: Tõnis Lukas

The political position is strongly centered on security and border control, standing in sharp contrast to the government’s policy, which leaves the border with an unfriendly neighbor partially open. The speaker views the government’s approach as based on illusions and stresses that this increases organized crime and security threats. The stance is strong and value-driven, emphasizing the necessity of closing the border.

The political stance is firmly opposed to the prisoner transfer agreement signed between the government and Sweden, highlighting the inherent domestic security and social risks involved. This is a value-based position, which warns against the collateral effects of an unchecked migration policy and criticizes the government’s overall approach. The speaker, representing the Isamaa faction, demands that the draft legislation be rejected during the first reading.

The political stance is strongly critical of the handling of the agreement concerning the transfer of foreign prisoners to Estonia, stressing procedural deficiencies and security risks. The criticism is aimed at the government's actions and lack of transparency, given that the contents of the agreement were not adequately presented to the public prior to signing. The position is primarily policy- and results-oriented, demanding clarity regarding both the educational rights of the prisoners and the necessary background checks.