By Plenary Sessions: Tõnis Lukas

The criticism is aimed squarely at the government's actions, particularly concerning the repeated failure to deliver on promises and the chosen funding mechanism. The opposition is primarily procedural, focusing on how the funds of the Cultural Endowment (Kultuurkapital) are being utilized and the creation of a new financial "side channel," the sustainability of which is highly questionable.

The primary criticism is aimed at the government partners (the Reform Party, Eesti 200) for their desire to increase the immigration quota and at the government for the insufficient enforcement of Estonian language proficiency requirements. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, highlighting the security threat posed by communities resistant to integration (Russians and Muslims). Opposition is also directed at granting voting rights to citizens of the aggressor state.

The primary conflict is with the government, which is being criticized for submitting the car tax bill—a move labeled a poor decision given the public's ability to cope financially. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the negative impact of the legislation and the administrative inefficiency it creates (the necessity of mapping data that should already be easily accessible).

The primary opposition is aimed at the Government of the Republic and the Prime Minister, sharply criticizing proposals by ministers (such as Riisalo) to increase the immigration quota and their failure to adhere to population policy. The criticism is policy-driven, accusing the government of organizing an uncontrolled influx and endangering state security. The speaker demands that the Prime Minister rein in the members of his cabinet.