By Plenary Sessions: Tõnis Lukas

The style is analytical and inquisitive, beginning with a formal address directed at the chairman and the rapporteur. The speaker employs logical arguments (such as the government's repeated promises) and raises critical, clarifying questions concerning the permanence of the funding mechanisms. The tone is measured, blending support with a degree of procedural skepticism.

The rhetorical style is extremely urgent and alarming, utilizing strong imagery (e.g., "on the verge of going down the toilet") to describe the nation's decline. The appeals are primarily emotional, focusing on security threats, but they also include a logical argument regarding the lack of control over immigration. The tone is formal, yet critical of the government and occasionally confrontational.

The style is formal and critical, but focuses on logical and detailed questions about the impact of the car tax, demanding specific answers regarding the exemptions. The speaker uses sharp assessments ("heavy blow," "bad decision") to describe the government's actions, yet presents themselves as an inquisitive questioner.

The rhetorical style is insistent, serious, and cautionary, employing dramatic imagery (e.g., "Pandora's Box," "down the demographic drain") and highlighting security risks. The speaker combines logical arguments (wage pressure, family migration ratios) with emotional appeals to underscore the critical nature of the situation and the need for immediate curbing. The tone towards the government is confrontational and demanding.